thewanderingbackpack@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 days agoShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?message-squaremessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up146arrow-down16
arrow-up140arrow-down1message-squareShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?thewanderingbackpack@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-squareMayor Poopington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·2 days agoRed Hot Chili Peppers is now considered “classic rock”
minus-squareinb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 day agoOofh. Oh yeah, that one hurts. Time is a bitch. I disapprove of the whole concept.
minus-squareTranquilTurbulence@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 day agoTime is relative. A 5 year old piece of software is ancient. A 100 year old stone church is very recent. If you find a stone axe that isn’t at least 10 000 years old, you can toss it back where you found it.
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoIn before Muzak version of Blood Sugar Sex Magik. :) https://youtu.be/zRjYSAwJ_Kw
Red Hot Chili Peppers is now considered “classic rock”
Oofh. Oh yeah, that one hurts.
Time is a bitch. I disapprove of the whole concept.
Time is relative. A 5 year old piece of software is ancient. A 100 year old stone church is very recent. If you find a stone axe that isn’t at least 10 000 years old, you can toss it back where you found it.
In before Muzak version of Blood Sugar Sex Magik. :)
https://youtu.be/zRjYSAwJ_Kw