What’s weird is that he’s complaining about androgynous names. Was he born yesterday?
Sucks to your assmar
Lord of the Flies? How?
Man, I swear I heard it. Probably on NPR. I can’t find it per se but I did find that it could come from devices concealed inside standard electronics, so I think a phone would make sense.
In my state, bartenders (and waiters) can be 18. You can serve and not drink. I thought that was similar in other states
Edit: same for beer, wine, liquor stores
Covering extremists with a critical take isn’t “giving them a voice.” People listen to this stuff. If you don’t understand it, you can’t understand other Americans
Oof, that’s a bit worse than I recalled. The article seems to be saying that he just views Ukraine as a pawn in a US-Russia or NATO-Russia war, which doesn’t seem fair. Some of his conclusions would be fair if it were just a US-Russia war but it just isn’t.
He’s identified in the article. I think it makes more sense than putting his name in the headline. Nobody knows who “Jonathan whatever” is. We all know what a banker is
I wouldn’t say heated with Putin but I do think he had some misguided conclusions about the invasion (honestly it’s been a while since I read his takes, but I remember being a bit confused and wondering if maybe he was losing his edge)
Wow that definitely wasn’t addressed in the first paragraph
In case you don’t get it, just go to google images and type in “John Holmes”
Please edit add a link or I’ll have to delete this, per rule 2. I assume it’s an honest mistake, given your history here
Wouldn’t that be more like “ick” or “ass,” respectively?
I mean…. gestures towards all the terrible shit Ye/Yeezy/Kanye has done in recent years
It’s probably true
The last relative I know of died about 20 years ago. She survived Auschwitz tho
Havana Syndrome is complicated and not well understood. It doesn’t happen randomly though. The best working theory was that it happened due to phones or other similar on-ear devices. It’s not space lasers or random shit like that
He should be reporting today, albeit not for fraud
It sounds to me like they are limiting the scope of things he can be charged with but not saying he’s immune from Jan 6 prosecution altogether
You mean the decision released like a whole hour ago? Someone is behind on the news
Lightning doesn’t strike twice. It would be one thing if one ex accused him, but two?