• cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    Israels occupation is the sole reason for 7. October. I do not agree with what Hamas did but

    What kind of abuser rationale is this? “Look what you made me do?” That twisted logic is exactly what Israel is using to justify their rampage at the moment. Killing innocent civilians is not OK, full stop.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Okay maybe Israel should have not been doing that since 1948 then

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        You should take ab_intra’s advice and read some history. People in the middle east didn’t discover violence in 1948.

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          There sure is a place that popped up in 1948 that has carte Blanche to do whatever the fuck they want to surrounding areas because they have a trillion dollar war machine mommy that comes calling every time she hears baby cry foul.

          I guess you skipped all that in your perusing of Wikipedia summaries.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            3 months ago

            I can’t take seriously anybody who throws around any single date as the beginning of conflict in the ME.

            • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I can’t speak for the other commenter, but I’m not naive enough to think conflict just appeared out of nowhere. It’s come from beefs between historic tribes and stretches back to before people wrote things down.

              It’s more like “those cops were just regular people whose families were beating other people up, then someone with a lot more Big Sticks came over and told them they’re now part of a special group who are the only ones allowed to beat people up and gave them a shiny gold star plaque? to prove it”

              Only instead of a gold star, it was drawing lines on a map and saying “this is yours, have fun”, and pretending to not see anything negative they do after that.

                • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Personally, I blame Ichthyostega.

                  All they had to do was just keep swimming. But no, they got a stick up their ass that told them “hey Bro, go on land Bro, surely you will not regret walking on land” and now my ass has to go to work on Monday.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Of course not, but there was a people that wasn’t in the middle east doing violence until that period.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m with you on violence bad, but if you were to consider Nat Turner’s rebellion, where many enslaved Africans escaped their captors and murdered white Americans (including women and children), as justification for slave owning Americans being unjustly brutal towards Africans and prohibiting them from learning to read, most people would justly tell you to fuck off and say those people that thought they could own other human beings based solely on the color of their skin should be condemned for all eternity. Hell they might even say those Africans didn’t kill enough of those evil whites

      I’d say, you’ll never achieve peace by attacking the other side, but you can only achieve peace if both sides want it. White Americans in the South during 1938 absolutely did not want peace with African Americans in much the same way Israelis don’t want peace with Palestinians today. It’s oversimplified but this feeling has always gone mostly one way. Black Americans have mostly just wanted peace, they don’t want revenge. The same goes for Palestinians. It’s truly amazing how hard it is/was for many white Americans and Israelis to learn and accept that fact.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        most people would justly tell you to fuck off

        You need better friends if any of them condone the murder of children in any circumstances.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          If they were justifying slavery because a few dudes killed some kids?

          Uhh… I don’t think you understoood what I wrote.

          I’m specifically saying it doesn’t matter how many kids one mob of people killed in comparison to the sanctioning and proliferation of chattel slavery for the sole purpose of increasing profits for a few wealthy white men.

          Personally, if someone told me ‘yeah, slavery was bad but there was this one group of slaves that killed a bunch of kids so actually slavery was kinda justified.’ Well, I’d have to disagree and I’d tell them to stop talking to me. And then I’d think what a … (censored so I don’t get banned)

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            in comparison

            Who the fuck said anything about a comparison? Killing children is bad. Full stop. Like seriously, just stop there. No comparisons, no deflections, no justifications. No other issues required.

            Killing. Children. Is. Bad.

            Ridiculous I have to spell that out, what the fuck is wrong with y’all.

            • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Uh I did. That was the whole point of my comment. I made a comparison to the situation going on in Israel. Why did you reply to my comment if you don’t care what I’m talking about and don’t care to understand?

              That’s a rhetorical question. I’m blocking you now because you’re being disrespectful and I don’t care enough to educate you or satisfy your need for attention

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m with you on violence bad, but if you were to consider Nat Turner’s rebellion, where many enslaved Africans escaped their captors and murdered white Americans (including women and children), as justification for slave owning Americans being unjustly brutal towards Africans and prohibiting them from learning to read, most people would justly tell you to fuck off and say those people that thought they could own other human beings based solely on the color of their skin should be condemned for all eternity. Hell they might even say those Africans didn’t kill enough of those evil whites

        I can understand killing their former owner, but not random civilians who had the misfortune of being born white.

        Let’s not lose sight of the fact that Hamas tortured and slaughtered hundreds of random civilians at a music festival.

        • Orbituary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Maybe you don’t understand it, but that’s exactly what’s happening to the 15 to 25,000 children killed by Israel in retaliation for 7-Oct.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I totally get that. I’m not saying it’s cool or anything. I’m specifically saying if we use that relatively minor **retaliation ** as justification to be 10x worse or 1000x worse then it almost doesn’t matter what the they did because it’s not even comparable.

          I’ll be honest, personally, of all the American history I’ve learned I couldn’t care less about what the group led by Nat Turner did to the group literally led by the various presidents of the US. It barely registers. It’s more like random gang violence driven by ignorant, emotional passion, where as what Americans were doing was legit calculated genocide (destroying culture, in this case, since obviously they were still breading people for profit) - it was done methodically and done to maximize profits and political power.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            I totally get that. I’m not saying it’s cool or anything. I’m specifically saying if we use that relatively minor **retaliation ** as justification to be 10x worse or 1000x worse then it almost doesn’t matter what the they did because it’s not even comparable.

            I agree, and can’t defend what Israel are doing. The irony is that both sides are essentially doing the same thing that they accuse the other of doing. They are both hyper-aggressive, racist zealots. I don’t know what kind of “reset” could make it stop.

            I’ll be honest, personally, of all the American history I’ve learned I couldn’t care less about what the group led by Nat Turner did to the group literally led by the various presidents of the US. It barely registers. It’s more like random gang violence driven by ignorant, emotional passion, where as what Americans were doing was legit calculated genocide (destroying culture, in this case, since obviously they were still breading people for profit) - it was done methodically and done to maximize profits and political power.

            I’m not American and never heard of this incident until today, so I can’t provide an informed comment. I think I agree with your assessment in general, other than the killing of innocents. I understand why they did it but I can’t condone it.

            • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              They are not doing the same thing at all. One group is defending their home, trying to survive, living under an occupation with a horrible life, no state, no support, and are constantly losing their home, while the other side is spreading, taking their homes, and trying to do a genocide and prevent the other side from having a state. It’s two completely different things.

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                They are both trying to put a genocide on eachother since the 1920’s

                What you’re seeing is a looong stretched religious territorial conflict. Sometimes it lasts a year. Sometimes it lasts centuries