You’re kidding, right? At this point, that’s almost the least of our worries.
You’re kidding, right? At this point, that’s almost the least of our worries.
How many generations of this now 2 or 3?
It’s been continuous since colonial times. It’s an unbroken thread from “indentured servitude” and “slavery,” to “sharecropping” and “vagrancy”/“convict leasing,” to “non-compete agreements” and prison labor being managed by prisons directly (instead of having inmates leased out).
I’m more concerned that there’s literally no one in the streets over it.
Every social media except for the fascist safe-spaces will censor and ban people advocating for violence even in self-defense, including this one. On top of that, the FBI continues to actively infiltrate and suppress left-wing protest movements. Is it any wonder that the public’s ability to organize against fascism has been effectively neutered?
Breaking shit is the only thing that has ever worked.
Even the civil rights movement, which The Powers That Be try to credit “nonviolent” MLK with in retrospect, only actually succeeded because the alternative was Malcolm X and The Powers That Be fucking knew it.
O-Zone (of “Numa Numa” fame) is from Moldova; that’s pretty obscure, right?
Ylvis (“What Does the Fox Say?”) is Norwegian.
“Epic Sax Guy” is… also Moldovan, apparently. Huh.
Poor whites may have been poor, but they sure as Hell weren’t in danger of being arrested for “vagrancy” for being unemployed and then worked to death in a convict-leasing scheme the way black people were.
(Or, getting back to the specific topic of this thread, having their neighborhood firebombed for being too “uppity” whenever they did actually manage to succeed.)
[angry high-frequency noises]
Why fake?
Depends on the salad.
(But let’s be honest, it’s usually ranch.)
Super heroes will not save us from this shit. Not ever. (Even if they weren’t fictional.)
Suburban homeowners are the real “welfare queens.”
baldy-made
What’s folks’ lack of hair got to do with their bottle cap making skills?
That’s what the “well-regulated militia” of the 2nd amendment was already supposed to be (give or take longbows vs. guns)
They’re not just asking for random people to be taken off
Yes. That’s how this works. They are indeed taking random people off the rolls.
No, he’s right: they’re not taking “random” people off the rolls; they’re choosing who to challenge based on specific characteristics.
Good luck with that. You can “disagree” all the way to the concentration camp.
It’s on Biden to personally demonstrate to SCOTUS just how dangerous the ruling was.
Sucks to be them, LOL!
How do you know they aren’t in a 2 party consent state?
I don’t give a shit if they’re in a two party consent state, because I’m not and so that state doesn’t have any jurisdiction over me.
You consented by calling me. Fuck off with this notion that you’re allowed to dictate what I am or am not allowed to do with my own property.
To be fair, I wasn’t entirely happy with my comment either. There was something missing, and I just figured out what it was.
Along with “sharecropping” I should’ve mentioned “sweatshops,” and along with “non-compete agreements” I should’ve mentioned anti-union laws like “right-to-work” and “at-will employment.”