- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday let a Republican-backed Texas law take effect allowing state law enforcement authorities to arrest people suspected of crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally, rejecting a request by President Joe Biden’s administration.
The court has a 6-3 conservative majority, and its three liberal justices dissented on Tuesday. The administration had asked the justices to freeze a judicial order allowing the Texas law to take effect while its challenge to the statute proceeds in the lower courts.
The law violates the U.S. Constitution and federal law by interfering with the U.S. government’s power to regulate immigration, the administration has argued.
the constitution enshrines certain inalienable rights to citizens. to citizens. citizens of some other country arent eligible unless they give up their old citizenship and become Americans.
roe v wade should never have been a Federal issue to begin with - pushing that decision back to the States was the right move.
Okay. You’re not a citizen anymore. And you no longer have any rights.
See why rights have to extend to everyone within our borders now?
my citizenship is inalienable until I either give it up or I die because I was born to American citizens.
Nope. Big government over there says you’re here illegally now. The guys with guns will be along anytime now to enforce your deportation. If you resist you’re going to be arrested and sentenced to work in the factory for no pay for several years and then dumped in Mexico.
that’s not even remotely how citizenship works. maybe do a smidgen of research first.
That’s not the point. If non citizens have no rights then you have no recourse to prove you’re actually a citizen once they declare you’re not a citizen.
Which is just one reason SCOTUS has consistently ruled that rights extend to everyone in our borders. The other is that many of our rights are actually restrictions on government power. And allowing the government to operate without those restrictions, even just on some people, builds the infrastructure for doing it to citizens.
Don’t get your face eaten by a leopard.
non citizens have no rights in countries they’re not citizens of. their rights are whatever the government in their country of origin says they have.
this is very simple.
You’re absolutely incorrect.
In the US, anyone within the borders of the country are given the same right to due process as everyone else. This applies to undocumented immigrants.
Oh okay. So since the US is your country of origin (in this case) and it says you have no rights, then you have no rights.
Yay, glad we could clear that up.
nah, I’ve got tons of rights. loads of em
Fun fact, legal citizens have been deported by ICE before because they didn’t care to check the paperwork correctly
To say nothing of RvW, do you really think the constitution doesn’t provide some rights beyond citizens? For context, check out the preamble to the Declaration of Independence. More importantly, you won’t find this delineation in the Bill of Rights. Immigrants are granted due process, as written in the 14th as “any person”. There are many protections granted to all, precisely because we believed all are equal. This is well established constitutional law.
legal immigrants, not some bozo who decides to larp across the border because it’s Tuesday
No. Everybody. Full stop.
It never ceases to amaze me how citizens of a nation can be so utterly wrong about what’s in their own constitution and bill of rights.
And I say this as a Canadian, because we’ve got Canadians quoting the Second Amendment like it’s law up here.
sigh
Hang on, hang on, I think you missed it. It applies to “ALL PERSONS.” You’ll note that it does not include “unless you’re an illegal immigrant.”
then why does ICE exist and why do they deport people? oh, right, because they’re illegal aliens
You’re just wrong here. And that’s okay, but take an opportunity to learn. Although many are deported without knowing there was a hearing, there still is what is taken to mean due process. See https://www.uclalawreview.org/the-ice-trap-deportation-without-due-process/
The fact is, you can just actually take a look at the 14th amendment. Or try to find the term citizen in any of the first 10. Or just keep being confidently incorrect.
The constitution absolutely does protect all people in many situations, and only xenophobia combined with poor education can lead somebody to disputing that.
Funny, I didn’t even comment on immigrant rights or the validity of RvW.