The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday let a Republican-backed Texas law take effect allowing state law enforcement authorities to arrest people suspected of crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally, rejecting a request by President Joe Biden’s administration.

The court has a 6-3 conservative majority, and its three liberal justices dissented on Tuesday. The administration had asked the justices to freeze a judicial order allowing the Texas law to take effect while its challenge to the statute proceeds in the lower courts.

The law violates the U.S. Constitution and federal law by interfering with the U.S. government’s power to regulate immigration, the administration has argued.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    52·
    8 months ago

    That’s not the point. If non citizens have no rights then you have no recourse to prove you’re actually a citizen once they declare you’re not a citizen.

    Which is just one reason SCOTUS has consistently ruled that rights extend to everyone in our borders. The other is that many of our rights are actually restrictions on government power. And allowing the government to operate without those restrictions, even just on some people, builds the infrastructure for doing it to citizens.

    Don’t get your face eaten by a leopard.

    • FunkPhenomenon@lemmy.zipEnglish
      13·
      8 months ago

      non citizens have no rights in countries they’re not citizens of. their rights are whatever the government in their country of origin says they have.

      this is very simple.

      • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
        41·
        8 months ago

        You’re absolutely incorrect.

        In the US, anyone within the borders of the country are given the same right to due process as everyone else. This applies to undocumented immigrants.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        22·
        8 months ago

        Oh okay. So since the US is your country of origin (in this case) and it says you have no rights, then you have no rights.

        Yay, glad we could clear that up.