The whistleblowers also allege Dr. Alexander Eastman was already under investigation for trying to procure narcotics for a friend who worked as a chopper pilot for the border agency.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    not at all, actually.

    it’s pretty clear that racism, as another example, leads to worse health outcomes for patients. For example, doctors not listening to black women when they say they’re in pain. that relationship goes both ways. Or the effects that the Tuskegee study had on trust, leading to generational distrust. you can dismiss a doctor’s bigotry because he’s skilled. But what happens when that doctor’s bigotry leads them to not use those skills?

    Will you say, “oh, he’s a great doctor… as long as you’re not a [whatever]”

    professionalism is a basic skill for doctors, nurses, and pretty much anybody out of highschool.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re really stretching this further and further to make a point that isn’t there. That example is fraught because if they don’t treat their black patients as well then their percentage is going to be lower. So they’d have to not be racist enough not to affect them professionally, which means it won’t affect my treatment. I also don’t know how racist a doctor is when I’m looking at their success rates.

      In any event, I want to live and I’ll go with the doctor that gives me the best odds. I’m not going to die to make a moral statement about racism or whatever because I can be a far more effective advocate by living.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You’re right. It does lower their percentage.

        You’re still laboring on the notion that you’re one of their in-group. This is not true of everyone.

        Which, i guess, means you’re perfectly happy saying “they’re a great doctor, as long as you’re [not something they don’t like.]”

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          When my life is on the line, I’m not making a stand over how the doctor treats others. I spend plenty of effort fighting for minority rights that are of no direct benefit to me (apart from living in a better society, but I’m old enough I’m never going to see that better society), and I’ll do more of that if I live.

          This is all hypothetical anyway because they person with lower survival rates is far more likely to be the racist than the more successful doctor to be a racist savant. Even if he was, 70% success with minority patients and 100% success with white men makes that a no-brainer when I’m part of the in group.

          What does taking a stand even get anyone? So I go to a less effective doctor and die while someone who gives zero fucks about racism takes my slot and lives. Is that some kind of win? For whom?

          • francisfordpoopola@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I rescind my last statement officially. He’s a douchebag who I would only be happy to see if I’m bleeding out on the side of the road. Then I’ll take his pain lollipops and life saving measures. How’s that?