By Henri Astier BBC News


Israel has suggested that the long-term aim of its military campaign in Gaza is to sever all links with the territory.

Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said that once Hamas had been defeated, Israel would end its “responsibility for life in the Gaza Strip”.

Before the conflict, Israel supplied Gaza with most of its energy needs and monitored imports into the territory.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      98
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s disengenuous. People complain about Gaza not having enough of its own water or electricity infrastructure and relying on Israel, but up until now Israel has required Gaza to get their permission on any new construction. So Israel have been holding Gaza hostage via water and now they’re cutting them off and making excuses for it.

      • mwguy@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t help when the government in the region digs up infrastructure to construct weapons with and makes hype videos about it.

        • NewDark@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man good point. Glad the Israelis aren’t using any weapons that are disproportionately more effective on a captive populace. The prisoners shouldn’t fight back against their oppressor through whatever desperate means they have available. Please die and suffer in silence, Palestinians.

          • mwguy@infosec.pubOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know right. Imagine they used air burst munitions or. Cheaper mass artillery barrages rather than the primary kinetic and precision strikes they use now. It would look like Eastern Ukraine in Gaza.

            • NewDark@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah yes, because the current bombing campaign against civilians and civilian infrastructure has been very humanitarian. So glad Israel has been showing “restraint”. Never mind the white phosphorous too, very legal and very restrained.

              • mwguy@infosec.pubOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Do you know how and why wp rounds get used? You mark a target with wp rounds and now it has an IR signature. So your artillery round can be a single “smart” round that hits your target.

                Without wp you’d need to send dozens of rounds in to only probabilistically hit your target and if there was unexpected wind or pressure you might need to try multiple times. That would level whole neighborhoods and sometimes would level them as a “miss”.

                People talk about wp rounds like they’re mustard gas or something. It’s a wp round per target or it’s 10-40 artillery rounds per target.

                • NewDark@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How about, no rounds per target?

                  I love how you’re debate-lording me on the specifics of how civilians, children and their infrastructure get blown to bits. Even if you could justify it in that way, that shit is still a war crime for a reason.

                  • mwguy@infosec.pubOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It’s not a war crime though. That’s the point. They’re not specifically targeting civillians. They’re targeting dual use infrastructure.

              • mwguy@infosec.pubOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                My bad. Imagine civilians killed in the original slave raid weren’t Jewish.

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They weren’t, the first civilian bombing in the conflict is objectively the bombing of a hotel that housed the Palestinian embassy of sorts, killed like 91.

                  Pointing fingers in this conflict is a bit idiotic, the protagonists are all ultra religious shitheads fucking over huge populations because of story time interpretations.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s very true, however I don’t believe Gaza had sufficient water supplies even before then.

          The whole issue is a mess, with so many bad actors on both sides.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        When the ruling party have publicly stated and action supported main goal in destruction of Jewish state, it is called security measure.

      • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t it be a better solution though inevitably? I know nothing about the region so please don’t take offense, just seems if Palestine was granted autonomy while it would be rocky at first being free to govern themselves would probably be good in the end right or am I missing a lot on the situation?

      • probablyaCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        So they give them water and electricity it is because they are holding them hostage. But they take it away and that is also bad. So they need to offer Schrodinger’s utilities?

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They keep them reliant on water from Israel by preventing them from building new infrastructure. At no point has Gaza had a sufficient water supply.

          • probablyaCat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Now correct me if I’m wrong, but this is the same group of people who, on video, showed how they dig up pipes to use for rockets right?

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yep, rocketing themselves in the foot-shaped hospital with that - or at least their government are. Even so, before they dug it all up I don’t think they had sufficient infrastructure.

              It’s such a complex set of issues you can always whataboutism almost any point. Not that I’m knocking you for doing it.

          • filister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And Israel bombed their civil airport, because it was representing a security concern for them. How not to love your oppressor, right?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The “moral” solution would be to provide electricity and water while they aid them in constructing their own infrastructure that they’ve been preventing them from building.

          If I take you hostage on a boat and free you in the middle of the ocean, that’s not a good thing, right? You can’t put someone in a bad situation and then claim that they’re responsible for themselves now and not take blame for it.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Destroy people’s homes, utilities, food, etc, then pulling out and saying “not my problem” while people die from lack of basic necessities and medical care as a result of Israel’s destruction and Israel does a pikashocked face while continuing to do whatever they can to limit aid getting in still seems pretty bad. Like, better than stealing the Territory…

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is a long term goal, not immediate goal. Having Palestine state (without Hamas) responsible for itself is a good thing.

        • buzziebee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seeing promising things about a 2 state solution being discussed at the Cairo peace summit. Let’s hope after the violence cooler heads prevail and we can see a lasting peace in the region.

        • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would just expect another militant group to take their place. Every bombing essentially creates a new radicals. Would you really expect Palestinians to just forget about all their dead realitives?

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hope they will remember why they have dead relatives. A lot of Germans died too during WW2, but they did make right conclusions.

            • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Funny how you compare them to the Germans when the Palestinians are the ones being ethnically cleansed.

              This is more like the Afghan war. Everytime you bomb a civilian you create a new enemy.

              • probablyaCat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Do you know what ethnic cleaning means? That it is different from genocide. Genocide is a method of ethnic cleansing, but not all ethnic cleansing is genocide. For example, Gaza did experience ethnic cleansing when Israel agreed to demilitarize the area and remove all settlements. All the Jews were forced out and it became essentially completely Arab.

                A peace deals that involves land swaps can be considered ethnic cleansing. But it doesn’t involve killing anyone. What is happening is a fucking war. It is between an underdeveloped region and a very developed nation, but it is war. And you can absolutely bring up war crimes, rules of engagement, etc. But at least know what those things mean.

          • probablyaCat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            See people always say this, but it isn’t some universal truth. Often people get exhausted and would prefer a shaky peace with a compromise over writing about random bombs and rockets.

            The IRA and Ireland (I’ve often seen people comparing Hamas to the IRA situation, but just imagine if the IRA had been demanding not only a united Ireland, but they also wanted England, Scotland, and Wales too). ETA and basque country. Although there are a lot more extremist groups in that region that could take hold, I will admit. Which is why Israel is likely planning on a wider more strict dmz until peace can be agreed upon and sustained. And if it cannot, then Gaza should probably work on their Egyptian diplomatic relations and a 3 state solution is more likely here.

            Because even if you want to think bad things about Israel’s government, they are working hard on diplomacy in the region and do not want repeated war with Gaza to sidetrack it. They were supposed to have diplomatic talks with Saudi Arabia until Hamas attacked them. Already have them with several Arab league nations. A large dmz, Hamas removed from power, and Gaza being forced to work with Egypt might accomplish that.

      • JoeCoT@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ll steal the territory after they’ve starved out anyone who was able to resist it.

        • probablyaCat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          They had complete control of Gaza and the whole Sinai Peninsula. Which quadrupled the size of land Israel controlled. But they gave control back to Egypt to make peace in 1978. Then in 2004-05 they completely withdrew from Gaza and dismantled and (sometimes forcefully) removed all settlements and settlers in an attempt at making peace.

          Now in the first situation since for 45 years, the two groups have maintained peace. The other Arab nations were less peaceful with Israel, however. Islamic jihadists even assassinated Sadat. But there has been peace with Israel.

          In the second, they used it an opportunity to essentially become a terrorist controlled territory. And increased the attacks. And reject any peace negotiations.

          So what should Israel do? What solution might you suggest.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they want to make Gaza a independent state, then let them have unrestricted maritime trade access with the world. Build them enough water and power capability to self sustain - then they can truly say ‘we did all that we could do, our responsibility is over’

            This escape from new york style prison city with no trade, no water, no electricity, and no imports, isn’t going to make peaceful neighbors.

            Populations that co-depend on each other for economic success are more peaceful, trade, and integration are keys to long term stability.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s only responsible that any decolonization process have the colonizer ensure basic services exists at the time of independence. In this circumstance the colonizer has prevented any imports of technology which could be used to create energy and water independence. Not to mention the bombing of infrastructure over time. They had more power generating capacity, but it’s been bombed.

                So if you want to get to a clean slate, clean hands, you need to provide the bare minimum so that there’s not an immediate humanitarian crisis when you give them full independence, and you’re no longer responsible.

                That being said I’m sure the Palestinian people would value independence over water and electricity, as long as they’re allowed to trade with other countries, they will take independence and a humanitarian emergency any day over no independence. It’s just not a good look for the colonizer

                  • jet@hackertalks.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    If you’re saying they’re an independent country and you’re not responsible, fine, treat them like an independent country. Don’t embargo their sea trade

                    If you are going to control what goes in and out, and not let people leave, and not let trade happen, call it what it is, a prison.

                    Governments running prisons have obligations and responsibilities to prisoners. Water food health care

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Removed under Rule 4. We aren’t going to let people call for the dissolution of a state or people. It doesn’t matter if they’re Israeli or Palestinian.

              • gmtom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Okay but you have to understand that by doing so you are decidedly and actively shifting the discourse to favour the Israelis, right?

                • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not if the discussion moves towards the Israeli talking points of the Palestinians are animals who need to be exterminated.

                  Atticles exposing that outlook are definitely allowed, comments advocating it are not.

                  • gmtom@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No my point is that in an asymmetrical situation like this actions banning speaking out over “both sides” really only favours one side.

                    Like if we have an issue with a large group of homophobes who have systemic power calling for the death of gay people, and in return those gay people making similar statements about those homopohbes because the homophobes want them dead, then by giving those two opinions equal value and banning them both you are intrinsically favouring the homophobes as they both hold the power and are morally in the wrong.

        • mwguy@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would they do that? They pulled out of the territory in 2004 in an attempt at peace. Every Jew who wanted to live there has been forced out.

              • gmtom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Palestine is more than just Gaza. You think they are going to be okay with Israel stealing their land as long as they are notstealing land from the giant open air prison?

                • mwguy@infosec.pubOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If the government of the West Bank was organizing this violence I’d be a lot more understanding of the violence.

            • mwguy@infosec.pubOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              0 in the Gaza Strip. 0 in the land that Hamas administers. 0 amongst the people that started the conflict.

          • filister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, “Israel continues to maintain direct control over Gaza’s air and maritime space, six of Gaza’s seven land crossings, maintains a no-go buffer zone within the territory, controls the Palestinian population registry, and Gaza remains dependent on Israel for its water, electricity, telecommunications, and other utilities.”

            I guess Gazans should have been really grateful for that…

    • anteaters@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well it’ll be a DMZ inside Gaza with a very hard border that nothing may cross so it will all be Egypt’s problem.