• FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreed. There’s only one solution. The UN needs to disarm both sides, depose their governments and make the whole area a UN protectorate. Remove any illegal settlements. Try anyone on both sides involved in war crimes or human rights violations.

    Israel and Palestine can not behave like grown ups? Take away their toys and put them in time out.

    • steltek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A foreign military occupation of an entire region in the Middle East to ensure peace.

      Does anyone remember how this one goes?

      • Wilibus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll take standing under a mission accomplished banner on an aircraft carrier for $200.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely agree. The two sides need to be separated and put in time out.

      However disarming Israel is politically impossible when they’re a cyber weapons super power.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Israel is a way more prosper place than Palestine and hence its people have way more to lose if the country is placed under sanctions, its companies cut off from trading with the West and its members of governament personally held accountable internationally.

        (Basically they’re susceptible to the same kind of pressure that forced the authorities in South Africa to end Apartheid and have genuinelly democratic elections)

        Those who have the most to lose are the easiest to convince, which is also why, on the other side, not even treating Hamas as a terrorist organisation (which is an even harder thing than “mere” sanctions) has stopped them from finding “soldiers” - as long as Israel makes sure those born in Palestine have nothing to lose, for many even joining an organisation internationally viewed as terrorist is still a step-up in life.

        If you pardon my language (but I think the situation deserves it), it’s quite paradoxical that the International community has to fuck up Israel enough so that they stop fucking up the life of Palestinians so much, to the point that the lives of said Palestinians improves enough that they end up having enough to lose from siding with or joining Hamas (which is alread being fucked up).

        Then again, maybe it’s not a paradox: look at how the only way to stop a similar bully, Russia, requires “fucking them up” in that way (being more integrated with the West, not having natural resources like that, and being a whole lot more democratic (even if imperfectly so) Israel would be a lot easier to sway away from acting as a bully.

        As far as I can see, it’s either that or the genocide of Palestinians and I would hope that not even in this day and age and not even if it’s one of the “slow boiling” kind, most people in the West would be ok with a genocide.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, nobody has quite the strength even for these two sides. First, war is not a linear application of resources, it’s unpredictable. Second, that’d be a precedent every nation with conflicts would try to prevent, and such nations are usually the strongest. Third, we’ve all seen over the years how well UN missions, peacekeepers etc work.

      • FMT99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean they can also just keep bombing and torturing each other for the next 100 years, it’s been working so well so far.

    • CommanderM2192@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the most historically ignorant comment I’ve seen this past week. There have been multiple wars in the past century where Arab nations were the aggressor and had the stated goal of genociding the Jews in Israel. Also, the last time the UN actually did something approaching that scale was the Korean War. Absolutely nothing since. They’re incapable of defending an entire nation.

      Any plan that involves the disarmament of Israel is just a plan for genocide. Educate yourself, you’re unbelievably ignorant yet you have access to the internet.

      EDIT: Purposefully murder dozens of babies? Coexistence is possible!

      • FMT99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You think their neighbors are going to attack a multinational UN taskforce? I don’t think you have the right to call anyone ignorant honestly.

        • CommanderM2192@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes? Terrorists from neighboring countries already attack Israel, a vastly stronger military force than they are. We literally just saw Hamas terrorists gladly launch themselves into suicide attacks to hurt Israel. There are multiple nations near Israel (i.e. Iran) that don’t give a fuck about the UN.

          It doesn’t have to be an organized military from a sovereign nation to attack and kill hundreds or thousands. If you want to actually stop the regional violence you would need to disarm the entire Middle East.

          • FMT99@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ofcourse Iran cares about the UN. You think they don’t know what will happen if they blow up a few German or American peacekeepers?

            You think Bibi’s policy of concentration camps and mass bombing is going to improve things? It’s worked so well so far.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The arrogance to think anybody would shy away from attacking “a UN taskforce”.

          You know, PKs get killed all the time. UN employees get killed. Everybody gets killed.

          You think it’s going to be different here? Or you are just ignorant of how this works cause it’s not interesting?

          UN is not something which would enforce rules. It’s not built for that, it’s not a world government.

          • FMT99@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The arrogance of thinking indefinite bombing and killing will get you what you want.

            I’m not saying it will be easy, but if the world doesn’t enforce something endless cycle of killing will never stop. Neither side is interested in anything other than extermination now. Not acting will result in some form of genocide. You could say one is already underway.

            • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not about easy or hard, it’s about this not happening cause there’s no force to make it happen.