• ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    The premise that merely having more than you need is inherently unethical is completely arbitrary, doubly so when only applied to those who have the most.

    I live a fairly simple and frugal lifestyle. The amount of money where I am living at the standard of living ideal for me, and my “savings are enough to ride out life in comfort”, is likely a much lower number than most others in the US.

    Does that make me more ethical than those others? I don’t believe so.

    • Charapaso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There’s no hard line, sure: I lived in the Amazon for years, so I know how to live off poverty wages. Poverty where I grew up in the USA seems almost plush by comparison, because a shitty trailer is far more comfortable than a thatch roofed house with electricity only 4 hours a day. My lifestyle now is middle class, and I feel like I’m living like a king. It’s a grey smear of a continuum of wealth and privilege and morality that I feel like I understand viscerally.

      However: my lifestyle and wealth is far closer to my friends in the Amazon than that of billionaires.

      So there’s a line, but it’s far closer to the top 0.1% than the rest of us. I can help a few friends get motors for fishing canoes, and still make ends meet if I’m careful. A billionaire could get electricity and running water for the whole town and not notice.