• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    I know the technicality is that it will be voluntarily stopping service rather than just ending new downloads like the ban says.

    But “app will shut down when banned” is almost comically anti-news.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Any social media that you isn’t open and self hostable (Lemmy, Mastodon, etc) should not be used. That includes Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, TikTok, and more.

    Most social media has, IMHO, been a net-negative for society and I am in the generation that grew up with it in its infancy.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      My one wish for Fediverse would be federated identities. So I don’t have to have baronvonj@<platform> for ever single one of them.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Lemmy sits a bit apart from the rest in that it doesn’t quite work for direct person-to-person interaction. Following Lemmy discussions on Mastodon is possible but clunky and Lemmy doesn’t quite know how to quiet all the @ mentions and things in comments made from Mastodon so they look really loud/busy. I can see Lemmy communities from Firefish but I don’t see any of the posts/comments (maybe I have to follow one first?). I’ve never tried following Lemmy from Pixelfed.

          But each of those platforms has a different UI. The experience and features posting media on Pixelfed is much different. But I still have to setup a separate Pixelfed instance account if I want to make use of them. And my data will thus be spread across those instances. And people will need to follow both the Mastodon and Pixelfed accounts if they want to see both sets of posts. I’d love to just hat the one identity to manage with my content from all platforms associated with it.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I second this opinion. The federated applications and communities aren’t perfect, but it’s less toxic and better to use in general due to the lack of an all-encompassing algorithm that guides your usage to increase views for ad revenue.

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “Utilities threatened to shut off my power so… I will turn off all the lights in protest!”

    That’ll show ‘em.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not the same. If all the users lose access in one go and a prompt allows them to easily send a mail to their representatives then they can put pressure.

      If they allow content to flow it could be 12+ months before some users start receiving errors when the ban is out of their mind. They might associate the less US content with the app not being good anymore.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Right well thats that then, better off do nothing and let your brand lose power than point out the issues impacting your service.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Reminder: TikTok is not actually important. Everyone can live their lives without TikTok, YouTube, etc. There’s an infinite amount of ways to entertain ourselves and there’s a lot of competing apps.

    This isn’t the government abusing its power to shut down some small business/upstart. It’s shutting down a serious national security threat and a monopoly. TikTok has abused their position many times in many ways, refused to cooperate, and has reached the, “find out” phase.

    • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is a false dichotomy on Lemmy, that the government should shut down Meta due to security threats too because of this. They can both be bad.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, they should shut down both. Honestly, X should be on the chopping block even faster that Meta, but Zuck seems committed to racing Musk to the bottom.

    • XNX@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is absurd. Facebook was literally used to sow division and help elect a fascist who constantly says he wants to rule for life and wants to imprison his enemies. Facebook and instagram is wayyyyy more of a national security threat.

      A congressman explicitly stated tiktok videos are swaying the opinion of people against israel and america’s genocide in palestine and now its being shut down. This is an abuse of power and its laughable you dont care because “china bad”

      If its not censorship because theres alternative ways to communicate than nothing is censorship other than being killed

    • ianonavy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t entirely agree. TikTok isn’t just silly dances, thirst traps, and trends—it has played a significant role in community organizing and coalition-building across social movements. Consider the university Pro-Palestine encampments or mainstream news reporting on social media reaction to the United Healthcare CEO’s killing. Neither is solely attributable to TikTok, but the scale and nature of discussion on the platform have demonstrably influenced real-world conversation and activism. Another example is Keith Lee’s viral restaurant reviews transforming the viability of small mom and pop businesses overnight.

      What sets TikTok apart isn’t just its massive reach (150 million monthly active users, nearly half the US population) but also its algorithm and features that enable collaborative, asynchronous discussion. Unlike YouTube Shorts or Instagram Reels, where content is mostly one-off entertainment with fleeting comment sections, TikTok fosters actual conversations. Features like stitching allow users to directly respond to others, creating an evolving discourse where users can trace context. At times, entire feeds become dominated by discussion of a single topic—sometimes celebrity gossip, but often major events like October 7 or the United Healthcare CEO killing. This level of organic, large-scale discourse doesn’t happen the same way on other platforms. A great example of this dynamic was when TikTok users collectively decided to migrate to the actually Chinese app XiaoHongShu specifically to spite the US government. That didn’t just happen—it was discussed and coordinated.

      In my view, TikTok is a national security threat not because of unproven claims about data leaks or state-authored propaganda, but because it provides an already restless and dissatisfied population with a real platform to discuss issues and organize. If a decentralized, open-source alternative existed at scale, TikTok itself wouldn’t be necessary. I acknowledge that TikTok—like any centralized platform—has real issues, particularly around privacy and censorship. But until such a decentralized alternative gains traction, TikTok remains important. And even then, I doubt the US government would be any more comfortable with a decentralized version, since it still wouldn’t give them control over what discussions take place.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Everyone can live their lives without TikTok, YouTube…

      I was an adult before YT and I don’t want to go back to a time before it existed. It’s just too damn useful as a self education tool. Need to learn how to DIY a plumbing problem? Youtube. Need to learn how to subnet a network? Youtube. Interested in the History of Moldova? Youtube.

      I finished my basement by watching youtube videos and learning how to do everything from framing to electrical to drywall to finishing work. There isn’t anywhere else you can freely get the same breadth of knowledge on-demand.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Wait until you learn about “libraries.”

        They’re what we used before everyone had the worlds store of knowledge in their pocket.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Can’t get ahold of your friend in Europe and you’re from the US? Just wait until you learn about “handwriting a letter and waiting weeks/months for it to get to them and having to wait even longer for a reply”

          It’s what we used to do before everyone found a much faster and more convenient way of doing something through modern technology.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            And I’m not sure the instant communication has been a benefit for us.

            edit: especially when it becomes more and more misinformation and AI slop day by day

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just fucking get it over with already! I’m tired of hearing about this shit every single day.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    That would go beyond the ban’s requirement for app stores to stop offering downloads of the app, but not immediately halt use of it.

    Before the tankies get mad about the “censorship” of the US while failing to mention the LONG list of things you can get straight up arrested for in China

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I wonder if they’ll sell or go down in flames.

    If they sell, it’ll just become overly moderated like Facebook.

    If they go down in flames, a bunch of overnight competitors will compete to succeed.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I see ZERO discussion about how this is obvious theatre. We are so incapable of standing up to basic manipulation tactics from the right.

    trump first started using tiktok as another xenophobic boogeyman, in what was a fairly nuanced situation - trump’s position being completely wrong, but ultimately some truth to the fact that companies run in China inherently have involvement of the Chinese government and thule should be reached, monitored and if abused, access should be removed.

    This actual push was always meant to be something to hang on Biden admin either way (because again, some valid points to a potential ban) but in reality trump will now “save” this artificial shutdown to “restore tiktok” and millions of low information voters and non voters alike will think he did something. And in the meantime, whatever the fuck this lemon8 and red whatever apps are will likely be a huge privacy monitoring home as midst will leave things dormant in background as well after tiktok is “restored”.

    Again, we are just so I’ll equipped for anything to do with technology.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I agree with you.

      And, well, I assume everything coming from the US is theater entertainment from the get-go. That’s why I don’t even bother discussing it anymore although I have recently pointed that out about Trump is trying to divert with the Greenland fiasco and the media is being complicit. This is just another one of the pile. I think he’s purposely flooding the media and pushing for Americans’ mental exhaustion.

      ultimately some truth to the fact that companies run in China inherently have involvement of the Chinese government

      I’d say that’s an understatement. The Chinese government is greatly involved in many aspects of their social media because they don’t have speech protections for individuals nor the press. Xi wants absolute control, so the Chinese government is also involved in other questionable news this week about sponsoring hackers who were primarily targeting the US for gathering intelligence: Millions of Americans caught up in Chinese hacking plot - US. They had state-sponsored malware on 10,000 computers targeting civil rights activists. It doesn’t seem in their interest to play fair, I wonder what their strategy would be if Trump steps in to stroke hes ego.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Also, part of me thinks one of his aides overheard someone talking about banning TikTok for this reason and thought to himself, “Sounds good but it’s too leftist for us to peddle. This would be great to pin on the old geezer!.” and pitched it to Trump as a win-win. It’s absurd, don’t listen to me.

  • GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    A lot of people are saying that the US government banned TikTok, but from what I’m understanding, that’s not really what happened and what’s happening. Or have I misinterpreted things? From what I understand, they were told they had to divest and sell, but they fought that and now are opting to shutdown rather than comply. Is that not the case?

    Either way, I’m gonna go all “I walked to school uphill both ways barefoot in a meter of snow” on this and say that my very little experience with TikTok users seems to suggest that its not much more than pure, unadulterated brain rot. So regardless of the fact(s) (i.e. shutdown / banned / etc), there’s maybe the tiniest sliver of a net positive here. Or not. It doesn’t affect me one way or the other and given where this country is politically (as well as where it is headed), I don’t give a rat poopoo.

    • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m posting the same comment in two replies here now, terrible behaviour, but yes exactly this was an attempt to force a sale and get tiktok into American ownership.

      It feels very neat that America would think tiktok would ultimately choose the option where it gets more money, but that the Chinese instead choose control.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        that being the case, doesn’t that provide more merit to tiktok being a data mining operation that China uses against American interests?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      brain rot

      It’s a superior algorithm. You get what you engage with.

      I’m going to miss the largest community of left leaning American creators, educators, and activists. I’ve learned so much about politics, social engagement, and community building.

      But that’s just my feed. I’m sure there’s a lot of crap too.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ok.

    (I bet tiktok doesn’t shut down, but if it does I can’t wait for my kids to tell me about all the meltdowns at middle school over tiktok shutting down. Too many parents let their kids have unfettered internet access. No, mine don’t have tiktok.)

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        No. They don’t.

        I installed the home LAN, set site restrictions, app restrictions, use parental controls on all their devices, use OpenDNS family shield, PiHole, and app installation controls on their devices.

        Even of they did find a way to see it I would see the IP address flagged.

        Sounds draconian, but social media is fucked up for kids. They can have access at 16. They have a shitload of other internet freedom, though. They’re good kids.

        • vala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          And all of their friends have the same firewalls when they go to hang out?

          Not trying to be rude but it seems kinda naive.

          My little sister is also not allowed on tiktok but she just uses it on her friend’s phones when they hang out.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Their web browsers are restricted off. They cannot install any apps. This discussion is about what my kids have on their devices, and telling me they might see it elsewhere is irrelevant.

            I don’t think you understand my knowledge level, you do me disservice by assuming I’m naive, and your rudeness is because of changing the conditions of the discussion to make yourself right by changing the parameters based on that invented naïveté.

            No, I can’t control what they see at their friend’s houses on someone else’s device. I saw the playboy channel at a friend’s house when I was a kid and I didn’t have cable at my house. That’s what kids do. I understand and accept this. I’m not a tyrant or control freak or clutching my pearls. That’s the part where you get to discuss good and bad about social media or any aspect of the internet with your kids, like a parent is supposed to do, and do your best to protect your kids’ mental and physical wellbeing within reason.

            • vala@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Ok I think this is a misunderstanding about what it means to “have tiktok”. If you mean in the context of your house sure.

              But I had this same conversation with my parents. There is no reasonable way to actually prevent a kid from having access to tiktok in some contexts. Parents who say their kids don’t use tiktok because it’s not allowed at home are just incorrect.

              My dad doesn’t get that when she hangs out with friends or goes to school, she IS seeing tiktok content.

              Seems like we actually agree here though.

        • Whateley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Good. TikTok is pure fucking brainrot. People acting like it’s disappearance is some great tragedy make me laugh.