Looking up those patents, the first alludes to a system where a player aims and fires an “item” toward a character in a field, and in doing so triggers combat, and then dives into extraordinary intricacies about switching between modes within this. The second is very similar, but seems more directly focused on tweaking previous patents to including being able to capture Pokémon in the wild, rather than only during battle. The third, rather wildly, seems to be trying to claim a modification to the invention of riding creatures in an open world and being able to transition between them easily.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    yeah now its brutal for anyone trying to make a living and excellent for anyone who already inherited a living and has more money than they could use in multiple lifetimes. I’d hate to go back to when it was just brutal for anyone trying to make a living.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      yeah now its brutal for anyone trying to make a living

      What patent or copyright is preventing you from making a living?

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think the problem would be similar. The rich and powerful would be the only ones to profit off of inventions and innovations.

      We still have indie game devs today. Imagine if any company could just copy an indie game and scale it up/polish a bit and get all the sales.