• Spzi@lemmy.click
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    “There is no such thing as a free lunch”, they said :(

    To pull more of the article into the comment section:

    The Republican Study Committee (of which some three-quarters of House Republicans are members) on Wednesday released its desired 2024 budget, in which the party boldly declares its priority to eliminate the Community Eligibility Provision, or CEP, from the School Lunch Program. Why? Because “CEP allows certain schools to provide free school lunches regardless of the individual eligibility of each student.”

    Of note is that the CEP is not even something every school participates in; it is a meal service program reserved for qualifying schools and districts in low-income areas. The program enables schools that predominantly serve children from low-income backgrounds to offer all students free breakfast and lunch, instead of means-testing them and having to manage collecting applications on an individual basis. As with many universal-oriented programs, it is more practically efficient and, as a bonus, lifts all boats. This is what Republicans are looking to eliminate.

    It’s the kind of provision that many would want every school to participate in. Why not guarantee all our children are well fed as they learn and think about our world and their place in it, after all?

  • bear_delune@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole point in these kind of moves is to cause congestion and exhaustion in political movement.

    It’s a struggle to campaign for actual improvements when we’re all stuck fighting garbage like this all the time.

    It’s deliberate obstruction and a standard GOP play

    • NutWrench@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The cruelty is the point with Republicans. The cruelty always has been the point. The cruelty always WILL be the point.

  • LordGloom@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, they literally get free lunch. It’s some ridiculous stipend over $100 a day. Tax corporations and the 1%, no never. Starving children though, excellent idea. Can’t get kick backs from a single parent who’s struggling. Plus we can use the money we saved to give Uvalde another armored vehicle. That’ll help the children. We are truly screwed.

  • Mister_Haste@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I imagine they twirled their mustaches and maniacally laughed while announcing this. How much more cartoonishly villainous can they get?

  • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m reluctant to use the word “evil”, but I can’t think of another word that accurately describes their goals and behavior. They simply hate anyone who isn’t just like them. Different race? SUFFER AND DIE. Different economic bracket? SUFFER AND DIE. Different beliefs on sexuality? SUFFER AND DIE.

    They think that others are a threat to the “moral fabric” of America, but they themselves are a threat to the mere existence of millions of Americans.

  • Myaa@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know, I try to keep an open mind and try to understand how the other side could come to the conclusions they do, but sometimes they really make it difficult. I genuinely don’t get how this could be construed as anything other than malicious. What’s the benefit in this? How is this “thinking of the children?” How did a political party come to represent views that are so aggressively anti-humanity? It’s such a bizarre platform to attach yourself to so proudly and openly.

    • Nooch@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. it just breaks my heart that people seem to have a goal to make the lives of the vulnerable as hard as possible.

    • GnarWhal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been thinking about this a lot. I’m absolutely not a psychologist, psychiatrist, or anything similar, but it’s starting to show that all of them have forgotten where they came from or the stories of where their family members came from. Most of these people were raised by Depression-Era parents who, without exaggeration, suffered and died due to lack of affordable food options. I’m sure some Republicans even experienced that same problem themselves in their childhood.

      I used to believe the ignorance of how important providing basic nutrition to the next generation is was based on a lack of life experience, and that may be true for some, but there’s no way every single one of them has no surface-level knowledge of true hardship. They have heard about it, read about it, and some have witnessed it firsthand.

      So to answer the question, it’s either a part of some long-term plan to control the public for their means (which is evil) or they are selfish pricks (which when you are in government, makes you evil). Unfortunately, it’s looking like both.

    • end0fline@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is just so incredibly odd to me. I grew up in a baptist church (would never step foot in one again.) The people there genuinely seemed to do good work, caring for the poor, donating toys to children, food as well. I do not understand where this push from the right came from. This is incredibly cruel and inhumane.

    • redandgray@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why? Assuming this is not a rhetorical question, it follows directly from the core authoritarian principle of Conservatism in the U.S.: Moral Hierarchy. That is to say, Those who rule are privileged above those who serve, and this is the basis of a ranked ever-swelling staircase of privilege.

      Any action or policy that supports the hierarchy is divine, and whatever threatens the hierarchy is evil. Free food, or food as a right, is antithetical to Conservatism because it diminishes a key point of leverage held by rulers going up the chain. When a person is fed, they are less inclined to honor the privilege of their supposed rulers. When a person is truly hungry, they are highly motivated to submit, and even to support the hierarchy that provides them with any limited access to food.

      In this philosophy, the ROI of free lunch is negative. The same argument applies to most forms of welfare.

      The cruelty is the point.

    • Deedasmi@lemmy.timdn.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I make six figures working at the highest levels of my career in support of government agencies. I used free/reduced lunches my entire schooling. It’s super ridiculous

      • shanghaibebop@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same, my property tax for this month alone will have more than paid for my entire schooling career of subsidized food.

  • BrewJajaja@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why would they alienate their voter base that mainly reside in impoverished red states? A portion of those poor brainwashed right-wingers have children too.

    Can you guys see the parallel with a certain spiteful CEO who is the reason for our exodus…

    • arefx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They know their voter base is too dumb and enraged by right wing propaganda to realize they are voting against their interests.