• Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Stone houses? Are you thinking of castles?

    In Europe most houses are made of brick and/or concrete, no need for a quarry anywhere nearby.

    Also, the heavier the house the better it does when it’s hot. In hot places of Europe, traditional houses had very thick walls, small windows and are painted bright colors to reflect light (and heat).

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Honestly my image was of some Italian village posted yesterday on Lemmy that looked like it was made of stone. Or Osgiliath.

      I do also remember houses with thatched roofs in England though, those don’t seem like they would survive a storm.

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Those are historical buildings, this discussion was about new construction.

        Historically people used to use what was locally available. Most of Italy has plenty of stones, that were also easily accessible, so regular people could build out of stone. But in other regions of Europe there were no stones lying about, so cheap houses were being build out of mud + straw, more expensive ones out of brick and much more expensive ones from imported stones.

        Thatched roofs will survive storms without issue. The reason why they aren’t used anymore except by rich people is cost: very labor intensive to place and on top of that the thatching has to be replaced every x years. They made sense when labor was cheap and transporting heavy goods expensive.

    • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      We did indeed have a lot of brickyards many moons ago. And they required clay quarries which you can still see all over Europe.