• curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Ehhh no, that’s not true.

    You can say no, but if they pull in some other reason (such as dogs) to give them a meaningful excuse, they now have probable cause for the search.

    Anything is now 100% admissible, you can sue but its not going anywhere, and they can still get away with planting evidence because they came up with whatever probable cause necessary to perform the search anyway.

    Edited to add: BTW, if your car gets all scrsthed up from the dogs, that’s just too bad.

    Get a dash cam, front and rear ideally, which also grabs the interior. You do not need to notify police that they are on camera, while in uniform they are public personnel and are not subject to any expectation of privacy while carrying out their “duty”. But it may be good to mention you have a camera in there, and no, you will not turn it off.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Don’t mention your camera because they will helpfully turn it off for you or it will mysteriously get “lost” in evidence.

      Let the motherfuckers find out at discovery. By then it’s too late for them.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s why I say two and saying no you will not turn it off.

        A cop fiddling with a camera after being told about it, or turning it off while “mishandling” their own body cam… Yeah that’s a good reason to get things thrown out.

        Added benefit of not making it to discovery by not having something planted in your car in the first place.