• Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    66
    ·
    3 months ago

    The criterion is very simple: Don’t vote for genocide committers, enablers or planners. That excludes Biden and Trump.

    If the Dems manage to produce a non genocide loving candidate, then vote vote vote and drag everyone who will vote for the non genocide candidate to the polling station.

    • GoddessNoAi@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      “I’d rather let someone who actively, aggressively advocates, enables, and wants genocide domestically and abroad to win the presidency, over voting for somebody who passively enables genocide to happen abroad because actively trying to stop it could ignite WWIII” is still a bad take.

      It’s baffling and hypocritical.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is hypocritical to delude yourself into believing voting for genocide is somehow not approving genocide. And i hardly doubt that stopping Israel from committing genocide in Gaza would ignite WW3.

        If you mistake it for Ukraine, think about all the help Ukraine is not getting so Israel can get it instead. Dozens of Billions in Weapons to slaughter a civillian population instead of helping Ukraine defend itself against Russias invasion.

        • GoddessNoAi@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not deluding myself about anything. The choice isn’t “vote for or against genocide” it’s “act to get less or more genocide”. It’s not a false dichotomy; if you’re not voting to defeat Trump, then you’re acting to get more genocide.

          By not acting to defeat Trump, you’re enabling genocide more than Biden ever has.

          • Lyrl@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            In some takes on the trolley problem (do nothing, five people are run over by a trolley an die, flip a track change switch and two people are run over by a trolley and die) flipping the switch is the morally worse option because then those two people’s deaths are your fault, whereas the five people who die because you did nothing are someone else’s fault. I don’t agree with that take, but it’s taken seriously in philosophy circles.

    • Lyrl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t get how in the Levant, where both Hamas and the Israelis have significant factions that want to genocide the other people, a situation where Hamas does the genociding (because an Israel without attack capability de facto also loses defense capability) is somehow more moral than a situation where Israel does it.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        You are making multiple false assumptions in there. The first being that 2.000 pound bombs are somehow “defensive”. The next being that a 30.000 fighters Hamas would somehow genocide all of the settlers, despite their army having hundreds of thousands of members. Then it goes further with this idea, that they want to eradicate them, when all they want is to get their land back. The settlers always have the options to leave and go back to their home countries. Meanwhile Israel as a settler colonial project has to commit genocide to complete itself because as long as a Palestinian people exists, it will demand to get back to its rightful land. Finally you are wrong about the reasons why people in Palestine support violence. They do so, because it is the only thing protecting them from annihilation. For Israelis it is a mix between believing, they need to commit genocide as being the perpetrator protects them from being the victims, classic imperialist greed and a big portion of racism and fascism.

        But in the end Israel will destroy itself from within as all fascist states do eventually. The question is how many more people the US helps them to murder in the meantime.