Multiple parties are jockeying for position in the aftermath of France's seismic snap election. The leftist New Popular Front (NPF) insists its ideas should be implemented.

Multiple parties are jockeying for position in the aftermath of France’s seismic snap election. The leftist New Popular Front (NPF) insists its ideas should be implemented.

France’s left wing New Popular Front (NPF) - now the largest group in parliament - has called for a prime minister who will implement its ideas including a new wealth tax and petrol price controls.

The leftist alliance secured the most seats in the recent French elections but fell short of the 289 needed for a majority in the National Assembly, France’s lower house of parliament.

President Emmanuel Macron’s Together bloc came in second and Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally (RN) party finished third.

France’s parties are now jockeying for position and it’s unclear exactly how things will shake out, but the NPF has insisted it will implement its radical set of ideas.

  • Wanderer@lemm.eeEnglish
    7·
    23 days ago

    Petrol price controls is a terrible idea.

    Why not subsidised (free) public transport, more cycle lanes more cycle parking, subsidised electric bikes, mandated EV charging.

    • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      82·
      23 days ago

      Because motorists hate anything that would help them. Why would you not want a separate bike lane as a motorist? It reduces congestion and gets the cyclist you hate so much off the road at the same time! It’s a win win!

      • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        22 days ago

        In my experience, people tend to not want things that don’t benefit them directly.

        If they don’t use the bike lanes they don’t want them to take up what could be a car lane they would use.

    • englislanguage@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      4·
      22 days ago

      Lots of places in France are so remote and sparsely populated that public transport does not work there, at least not yet. It may or may not work once autonomous vehicles are fit for rural areas, but this may take a while.

    • maniii@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      22 days ago

      Controlling Fossil Fuel prices can prevent other private entities from driving up inflation of commodities. It doesn’t have to be permanent, you could effect a set goal for 6 years, evaluate the results every 6 weeks, and tweak the pricing to prevent inflation/deflation cycles.

      While you control the transport costs, you can now plan on how much energy it is consuming to do the logistics. Even setup renewables for the remote regions with medium to large capacity backups ( not just chemical batteries, but pumped storage and other practical solutions ).

      You could increase the buffer between different urban zones, commercial, industrial, heavy commercial, dense residential, suburbian.

      • Energy storage densities.
      • Vehicular traffic densities.
      • Public transport frequencies.
      • Private traffic exemption zones.
      • Cycling/Pedestrian infrastructure.
      • Rent-controlled segmentation.
      • Recreational facilities , maintenance and usage.

      All of these things can be measured, calculated, even funded by simply controlling the Fossil-fuel prices.

      Imagine 10 or 20 stadiums with Extra-Large battery backups, only on game-nights the full bank would see utilization, rest of the time, half or even quarter of the load can be saved up for fluctuations. In emergencies the stadium provides power, safety, shelter and communal support.

      So many things can be planned around transportation and logistics. Fossil-fuel literally drives a lot of the traffic. Measure, calculate and control that and you have a reliable method to make sensible common sense decisions. Transparent for all citizens to see the data and the correlation. Accountable for every cent.