• paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    Doesn’t this bely the “toned down language on abortion” that leaves it to the states? Because once it’s a constitutional issue, the supreme Court can overturn any state’s protection of abortion rights. Just the idea that a ball of unconscious cells has the same or more right to life as the 24yr old women it lives in is disgusting to me. His platform is just more vague, it still contains all of the possibilities of the original.

    Can we at least deny rights to the sperms and eggs? How about ensuring the right to contraception

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      They don’t care about lying or hypocrisy, so unfortunately your first point is moot to them. They have no honor to go back on.

      • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        They are making this new list to keep voters who were unhappy with project 2025 so I think it’s important to point out it doesn’t actually exclude any of those provisions. It’s not a promise to be more moderate and actually winking at the far right the whole time.