For hypothetical example; Father/son duo are criminals, harming, killing, and stealing innocent civilians. Superhero fights them, resulting in the father dying. Son is now portrayed as a sympathetic villain because all he wants is to avenge his father… despite all the fathers of children they murdered whilst comitting crimes.
Side question; do you feel sympathy for the villains portrayed like this?
When it’s done right, it’s thematically about how violence begets violence, or maybe the writer is making their rivalry more personal. Without specific examples to dissect it’s impossible to make that call though
It makes sense, I suppose. maybe I’m just a bit jaded about villain writing. I just feel like a lot of the time villain motivation seems to come after the villain themself. Like the villain and their methods was created, and then a motivation for that was created to make it make sense. Rather than creating a motivation and then designing the villain off the motivation. Not all villains, of course. there’s some pretty complex and fantastically written ones out there. But sometimes, there’s a lot of villains where it seems the writers just REALLY needed some kind of relatable motivation.
You might just not like bad writing.
I mean, they’re writing a comic book. The superhero and every other character started as a concept doodle and a story was written around them.
I’m now curious why that detail bothers you for only villains.
It doesn’t only bother me for villains, I just had villains in particular on the mind. I get it though. I was just watching TV and Aquaman came on and I’ve seen a bunch of other superho movies on TV lately, so I was just thinking a lot about the tropes I see a lot, and that particular example was at the front of my mind.
I’d also recently scene Age of Ultron, where the twins had, in my opinion, a really questionable reason for siding with Ultron.
I also love writing fiction myself, and I have a terrible habit of disecting just about every plot point I encounter in media to see what “makes them work”, or not work, to see what I can learn from them for my own writing. Makes me awful overly critical of some things.
Villains must be tricky. It’s hard to make evil motivations relatable to most people. (who I’m assuming are good people)
We really want to believe that some horrific event caused the downfall of this person, but sometimes “I just wanted to see if I could” is a legitimate, although unsatisfying, evil reason to do something.
Doesnt real life work that way? All the ways of doing crimes were pretty much figured out before any of us were born.
Because humans are complex creatures able to have a multitude of emotions at once while also not feeling other emotions at all. Our brains are masters at compartmentalizing. Think of those at the tops of the nazi regime, the elites. They had family members, and would be devastated if their family members died, but they also knew the truth about how many jews they were slaughtering and torturing per day. A great movie example is The Boy In The Striped Pajamas, where a nazi government official overseeing a death camp has so much genuine love for his family, while having no issues overseeing the task of killing mass amounts of jews in the day-to-day.
Villans in the stories we tell are no different. A character, whether good or evil, is only interesting if their emotions are as complex as real humans’ are, otherwise they feel flat, like cardboard, or boring and unrealistic. Real humans who have personality disorders where they don’t feel emotions tend to learn quickly how to pretend to have them. Isn’t that wild?
It might be done for a variety of reasons.
You can give the character more depth, humanize yhem, or make them a more relatable by showing how they deal with loss.
You can show the villian losing their last shred of humanity or sanity and raise the stakes. The villian’s goal may shift from robbing banks to destroying the city.
You have a reason for the villian to attack the hero directly instead of fighting the hero when he shows up to ruin the villian’s plan
I’m really struggling to remember any instance of this, although admittedly I’m not that much up on superhero comics.
But that said, I’d look at:
-
Is the hero responding with an appropriate amount of force, given the capabilities and crimes of the antagonist?
-
Is the villain also affected by some larger system or circumstance which makes their actions, when examined on a larger scale, sympathetic?
-
Does the surviving villain understand that what they are doing is wrong?
I think this was Black Manta, his dad and Aquaman in the Aquaman movie.
that’s also the same movie where the hero unleashed an army of piranha zombies on both sides of a civil war he was trying to stop and made out with his girlfriend for like 30 seconds while his pet kraken massacred his soon-to-be subjects… it was an enjoyable action film, but nuanced writing wasn’t it’s strong point imo, haha
-
It wouldn’t make much of a plot for the bad guy just to be after money. It doesn’t even work. If your goal was to make money, and didn’t have scruples, you wouldn’t spend who freaken knows how much effort learning martials arts, making rayguns, and you definitely wouldn’t go into a car throwing ramapage.
You would just get a job at Goldman Sachs or Wells Fargo. One thing I liked about Better Call Saul, he is in it for the money. A simple motivation that is not sympathetic.
Because for some reason, hollywood can’t make proper villians anymore. Everyone has to be some kind if anti-hero or have a tragic backstory.
One of the reasons all these superhero movies suck. It’s just poor writing.
People form bonds with other people, in a way that doesn’t happen between every person and every other person.
