Locking for rule 5.

Locking for rule 5.

Locking for rule 5.

aight

Thanks for the clear response. So it is safe to assume that federated remote communities get permanently saved to the instance?

Gone. The instance owner no longer hosts the instance.

OP, I’ll be locking your post as it violates rule 5.

OP, I’ll be locking this post as it violates rule 5.

OP, please mark this post as NSFW.

No problem. Though I’ll be locking this post. It really generated lots of reports and drama in the comments section.

Just as a side note: Accounts not on the instance of the community (in this case lemmy.world) will have problems receiving and resolving reports.

This is a known issue and will be supposedly fixed in Lemmy v0.20.0

I’m pretty sure the LW admins explained why they didn’t upgrade to 0.19.5 and that they were waiting for 0.19.6.

Are you implying that world won’t update? You’d be wrong.

99.9% / 0% / 0.1%

The upcoming v20.0 lemmy release should fix remote moderators not receiving almost all of the reports.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4744

Then I’ll be able to moderate [email protected] actively from my programmings.dev account and finally abandon this account for the time being.

I never block anyone or any instance. I simply ignore them. I also use the subscribed feed, so what most of the people say about hexbear, lemmygrad, etc. content filling their feed also does not affect me.

That’s what uBlock Origin planned to do if YouTube ever decided to etch ads into the video stream itself.

I was just given a computer with unrestricted internet access and learnt it that way. Of course, the internet being unrestricted made me visit some questionable and illegal websites. Including CP and some hardcore NSFL using the tor browser. But I don’t regret it (other than the last points).

Yeah, tell them that when they were trying to deanonymize tor users