• xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The type of traffic shaping you are thinking off can still be done under net nutrailty and was never an issue.

      • Kraiden@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Net neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything

          • Kraiden@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            6 months ago

            To. Protect. It.

            You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?

          • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            Because companies like to make money by breaking the status quo when there aren’t any rules.

            It’s the thing they like to do most honestly, and why we need to make rules when we see open loopholes

        • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          6 months ago

          But there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            6 months ago

            This is totally missing the point. What happened is the equivalent of the bus company calling the supermarket and saying “hey, I’ve noticed a lot of people going to your store. If you want to keep that, you’ve got to pay extra so I don’t drop half the busses from your route”