• gloss@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Eat shit Lindell. Sell some more pillows if you can. All you had to do was quietly be a millionaire selling cheap garbage pillows to idiots, but noooo you thought you could have an influence on a national scale and overthrow an election. Turns out you were wrong.

    • ringwraithfish@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same way “Joe the Plumber”, Kim Davis, Kyle Rittenhouse, etc. GOP elevates their story to the national spotlight to “prove their point” and then leaves them out to dry after their 15 minutes of fame have been used up.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        75
        ·
        5 months ago

        Kyle Rittenhouse was CNN and BLM racebaiting. Turns out he shot white people.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          68
          ·
          5 months ago

          Everyone knew he shot white people. They’re just mad that he didn’t let people kill him or burn down private businesses.

          • DeepGradientAscent@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            31
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Everyone is a “class-traitor” to a mob of looters and bullies.

            Both you and the commenter you replied to are down-voted to hell, but I agree, and I’ll immolate myself on this hill with you. There’s little room for nuance on <insert_social_media_here>, but we must uphold a torch for civic comprehension and reasoning, despite the heavy taxation of internet points for doing so.

            Are police a para-military gang with zero accountability and dog-shit standards of entry and education requirements? Yes.

            Do black lives matter? I take the Cthulhu position: no lives matter, and that’s a fact.

            Should Kyle Rittenhouse have been in that situation as an armed teenager with zero de-escalation skills? No.

            Did Kyle Rittenhouse have the right to defend themselves and property (it wasn’t his property) from harm from threatening rioters and looters of any ethnicity with lethal force? Does anyone? Yes.

            Did he have to use lethal force in that situation? My opinion is no, but it also goes back to the fact that he shouldn’t be there in the first place.

            Should he go to jail for it? In this case, judging by the video evidence in his case, no.

            Did the “soft-Authoritarian left” demonize him without nuance to make him into a scapegoat, radicalizing him even more towards authoritarian-right philosophies and talking-points? Absolutely.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I agree with all your points except your opening comment and your final point.

              I’d replace your final line with:

              Did he go there hoping to use his shiny new gun, and stay in a volatile environment he should never have entered until finally he got the legally defensible excuse he went there looking for? Yes.

              https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/live-trials-current/kyle-rittenhouse/prosecutors-want-to-use-video-of-kyle-rittenhouse-allegedly-expressing-desire-to-shoot-a-black-man-with-his-ar/

              And as a bonus:

              Does anyone at all believe that ridiculous crying act he pulled during the trial? God I hope not.

              The law is the law (especially if you are white) and he managed to stay within it. I acknowledge that without for one minute believing he went there for any reason but hoping to use that gun.

              Edit: While I’m at it –

              Did the “soft-Authoritarian left” demonize him without nuance to make him into a scapegoat, radicalizing him towards authoritarian-right philosophies and talking-points? Absolutely.

              Huh. I thought “personal responsibility” was a big thing with right wingers. I say he made his own choices to be there and do what he did, and he made his own choices to behave like a racist scumbag. He can choose to stop on any day. That responsibility lies on him.

              https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kyle-rittenhouse-out-bail-flashed-white-power-signs-bar-prosecutors-n1254250

              • DeepGradientAscent@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                5 months ago

                That responsibility lies on him.

                Morally, yes, I would say it does, but laws aren’t designed moral per se, they are (in part) designed to differentiate and assign culpability.

                In the jury’s interpretation of the law, the mob of looters and their aggression is more culpable for the deaths in question than Kyle was. As a DA, I would have tried him for manslaughter, not capital murder (if I’m recalling correctly).

                Under the law, in that situation, he acted in self-defense. Was he hoping to do so? Yes. He got his wish, tragically.

                Did the auth-left narrative feed into his spiralling down the right-wing rabbit hole and the MAGA people’s victim-complex? Yes, absolutely. Also, a tragedy.

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I’m just not seeing the justification for your last statement, though I continue to agree with your comment regarding legality. No one’s opinions about me are going to turn me into a maga, and I can’t see how they would.

            • Kaboom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              5 months ago

              I would argue he had the right to be there. He worked in that town, and lived maybe 15 minutes away. And further more, it was a public area. Angry mobs dont own the street.

              • DeepGradientAscent@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                I agree.

                He, and any American citizen, has a right to be anywhere that’s his property or public land/property. Freedom of movement, unless lawfully restricted, is one of our fundamental legal rights.

                Should he have been there? Probably not. And definitely not armed with zero training or combat experience with an AR-15. Also, it’s safe to say he wasn’t trying to protect his property, or any property, in a de-escalation-first mentality.

                Is that illegal? No. Is it reckless and dumb? Yes, very much.

  • Icalasari@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wait, I could have gotten $5 mil by proving him wrong?

    Fuck, why did I have to learn about this AFTER the fact?

  • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    Federal Judge orders MyPillow founder, Mike Lindell, to pay $5 million within 30 days for losing an election challenge. Lindell, known for denying the 2020 election results, had hosted a contest to prove his claims but lost. Despite Lindell’s intention to appeal, he must pay up immediately. Lindell claims financial hardship, stating his company organized the event, not him personally, and he has minimal assets. The dispute arose when Lindell failed to provide promised evidence, leading to arbitration. While the judge expressed concerns about the arbitration panel’s interpretation, he upheld the decision. Lindell’s financial struggles extend beyond this case, including defamation lawsuits that drained his resources.


    The original article contains 391 words, the summary contains 134 words. Saved 66%. I’m not a bot and I’m not open source!

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why do all these genius millionaires/billionaires suddenly have no money when it comes to paying their court ordered punishments?

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t get to hoard unreasonable amounts of wealth by being someone who pays others what they are due.