• CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a weak justification, but here is a strawman:

    If a person is involved in a firey buscrash, it is helpful to the coroner to know what biological sex someone was born as to help with identification (different bone structures etc).

    To tear that strawman down again, there is absolutely no reason that the drivers licence couldnt show their gender, and the authority could also track their sex in their system.

    Of course, this is Florida, the answer is obvious, they are doing it to fuck over trans people…

    I understand that not being able to change forms of ID can cause problems for trans people, but if I were trans, I would be terrified to out myself to the state of Florida. I feel for my brothers and sisters affected by this bullshit.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      That justification gets even weaker when there’s no fire in the lethal crash. They’re not looking at burned skeletons, they’re just looking at corpses.

      Also! Skeletal differences are actually minimal in people who transitioned at a young enough age, so that wouldn’t even be helpful in their case.

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, its a weak justification, but worth lining up, so that it can be knocked back down.

        In this strawman, the point is to be prepared for the worst case, which would be skeletal remains only.

        The skeletal differences being minimal depending on the age of transition is interesting, do you have a source? Id like to know more.

        Of course that gets even muddier for this strawman, because the authority could make up arbitrary rules like “If you transition before X years old, you can change your official gender”. Which ends up essentially the same as the “when is it life” discussion, and we all know how that panned out.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The defining skeletal differences are mostly in the pelvis, which undergoes much of its development in puberty. Intervention in those years should allow for trans teens to develop along affirming physiological lines, rather than being mutilated by a dysphoric puberty.

          Buuuuut I did overstate my case, though; such early treatment is still on the rarer side, so it doesn’t look like there’s definitive answers on how that impacts skeletal development. We can draw conclusions, I think, but the literature is mostly focused on the psychological development rather than looking at physiology.

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, possibly needs more research. I read something about bone density being mostly unchanged, but that may also be intervention age dependant as well. Also, as a fairly contentious issue, the literature is also prone to biases.

            Thanks for your response though, I appreciate it :)

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      If a person is involved in a firey buscrash, it is helpful to the coroner to know what biological sex someone was born as to help with identification (different bone structures etc).

      Yeah… no. The bone structures aren’t that different. It’s more likely that anthropologist can’t identify the sex by bones alone than they can. I also can’t think of a different reason for it, but there really doesn’t need to be a reason for them to just be bigots.