• A group of lawsuits accuse large landlords of price-fixing the market rate of rent in the United States
  • A complaint filed by Washington D.C.’s Attorney General alleges 14 landlords in the district are sharing competitively sensitive data through RealPage, a real estate software provider
  • RealPage recommends prices for roughly 4.5 million housing units in the United States
  • RealPage told CNBC that its landlord customers are under no obligation to take their price suggestions

A group of renters in the U.S. say their landlords are using software to deliver inflated rent hikes.

“We’ve been told as tenants by employees of Equity that the software takes empathy out of the equation. So they can charge whatever the software tells them to charge,” said Kevin Weller, a tenant at Portside Towers since 2021.

Tenants say the management started to increase prices substantially after giving renters concessions during the Covid-19 pandemic.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Then where does the money go?

    If someone rents you a house do they get to charge only the mortgage? What about repairs and other unforeseen expenses to keep it up? And if you pay for repairs that never happen, what then?

    If people can only break even on renting, many just. They’ll sit in empty houses until market prices increases, exacerbating all of this.

    • JCreazy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      What I’m saying is renting shouldn’t exist to begin with. People should not own more than one living place and that place should be the place that they live in.

      • Chef@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Housing is a human right.

        Article 25 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, created December 10th, 1948:

        “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.”

        Adequate housing is a human right.

        Homelessness is a human rights violation.

        America needs to understand this.

        • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Humanity collectively decided this shit 76 years ago and America still can’t get with the program. Smh.

          Sigh …this feeling of disappointment in my country is unceremoniously familiar.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        OK. What does someone do when they move somewhere new and can’t afford to purchase a house? Or don’t want to purchase a place because they expect to live somewhere 6-12mo for a contract?

        • GoodbyeBlueMonday@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The solutions I’ve seen require a fundamental rethinking of the way housing works in the USA (and most places), where renting just turns into another way to build some amount of equity, and the property managers are under more democratic control. More of the process subsidized by the local government, in the same way that water treatment is.

          Arguably it’s renting by another name, but the central point is to strip the profit motive out of it (some salaries are needed, but in a system with more regulatory oversight) and to allow the renter to get some financial benefit so they aren’t simply pissing money away.

          Apologies in advance for that vague response: I’m not an economist or real estate expert, so I can’t back up that general idea with any kind of details or evidence it’s feasible.

          • Neato@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, I agree totally. That’s a great idea. Lease-to-own or something similar. As a renter I’d love to build some form of equity. Because in the US the only real way to build equity or generational wealth is through owning property. Which makes real estate a VERY hot commodity to speculate in. Which is a huge problem for people who just want somewhere to live and built modest equity like everyone else has.

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Public housing, rented at cost directly from the government. And you can stay in the house as long as you want, so it eliminates the “risk” of renting. Done. Solved it.

          Now just fucking build some public housing please.

          • Neato@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think this is a good idea for public housing. BUT that is not what the vast majority of americans want to live in. Uniform apartments, townhomes or small single-family homes are not the norm and I’d hesitate to make the majority of future developments so homogenous.

            And then you have the issue with government-provided housing as we’ve had in the past: underfunding, under policing, bad locations, NIMBY assholes, etc. We already have subsidized housing/rental assistance: Section 8. So this would be a constant battle to just keep it decent.

            • novibe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Public housing doesn’t need to be uniform or boring… that was mostly a result of the ideology of urban planners of the mid 20th century when most public housing projects happened. The government can contract a private developer to make a nice building, that is well located, and is not just for poor people. That seems so obvious, but it seems people are stuck by their own ideology and can’t even think a bit outside of what is, or has been.

              And I’m not talking about subsidised, I mean PUBLIC. Owned by the government or by coops, councils etc. Built using federal money. Just having this around would decrease overall housing costs so much… the market would have to compete with the no-profit, cost only, rents of public housing.

              And Amazon has done a lot of research and found you only need to control 8% of a market to control the pricing. The government just has to build enough public housing in major population centers facing rent crisis to own 8% of total housing there. And that’s it. Rent cost crisis averted. And thousands of jobs and GDP generated because of all the construction (add in extra infrastructure for better access to the public housing, and you got a real economic boom cooking — hint hint, it’s literally what China did lmao).

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Three thoughts.

        1. Sometimes I need / want to rent. Example, I had to repair the foundation of my home and needed a single family home to rent for my family while my home was being repaired for 6mo.

        2. Hotels / motels / inns are a pretty reasonable use case. People need temporary housing for travel.

        3. I don’t want to live in an area for more than 5 or 10 years, I want to rent. Buying a house is a huge fucking pain, and is always full of expensive surprises once you move and have the maintenance on you.

        I could go on, but IMHO, there are a LOT more reasons why renting is actually useful, and I might want someone else to be on the hook for the mortgage and maintenance.

        • JCreazy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          There will always be scenarios where renting is necessary but what I was getting at was it’s out of control.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Co-ops, or other not for profit rental models. Doesn’t have to be a for profit corporation just to manage the building.

        • Shalakushka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          “Gosh, I would love to pay the same amount or more to build no equity and have some shit bag landlord paint the walls white and claim he made repairs” said practically no one. Even if they did, there isn’t a reason to maintain an insane system for the benefit of very few.

      • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        People should not own more than one living place and that place should be the place that they live in.

        This isn’t realistic. Maybe not owning additional homes for the sole purpose of renting to make a profit would be a better statement to make.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          No renting = I hope you like camping in the woods, because that’s going to be your only option when you travel for vacation.

          • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Hotels/motels still exist.

            I’m not going to get into the discussion about whether renting should or should not exist but I can get behind the idea that renting for profit shouldn’t be a thing.

        • JCreazy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          No thanks. I already own one. I don’t need to buy another one. I’m not greedy after all.

          • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You let me know how id have a roof over my head without the ability to buy a house. I’m sure it’ll be brilliant advice.