Calls are growing for the UN Security Council to be reformed after the US became the only member to use its veto power to block a Gaza ceasefire resolution, a move welcomed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The UN chief says he will keep pushing for peace.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, same. The ability of certain blocs to railroad the UN is obscene. We should protect our veto tho

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We should protect our veto

        The countries that currently have a veto make less sense the way the world is developing.

        France and the UK have a veto, but Germany doesn’t? China has a veto but India doesn’t?

        I get that it’s based on historic disputes after the war, but it doesn’t fit the current world well.

          • Jilanico@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t know India was offered! After some reading (skimming) the US offer in 1950 was to replace China, but Nehru didn’t want to stir up controversy. The Soviet offer in 1955 might not have made any headway, but I’m not sure why that’s the case.

        • Jilanico@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the UN isn’t reformed, there’s nothing stopping these rising states from starting their own UN

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because of “one nation one vote,” it is trivially easy for the more hardcore Muslim bloc or authoritarian nations to shove things through that should absolutely not be shoved through.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            And basing it off population would essentially give China and India the power to vote themselves whatever they wanted. It’s the US legislative problem all over again and do we really want one world government in the end?

            • Iceblade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, many people fail to realize that the places in the world where individual rights are (mostly) respected are actually few, with only a minor portion of the world population.