• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The problem is you can’t efficiently electrify a vehicle designed for fossil fuels. The requirements differ too much.

    Actually EV conversions were common before we got intentionally designed EVs and the original Tesla roadster was built on a standard Lotus body and frame, but luckily we’re beyond that now.

    You can still choose to electrify a vehicle now but you get poor performance and range, unbalanced handling, and pay way too much for a mediocre vehicle. It’s bot worth it

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They mean at the design/manufacturing level, not retrofitting.

      They mean just creat a simple ev car with only the needed designs to house the battery, controller and electric motor(s).

      They mean discard all ideas of “futuristic” interiors, techs, or anything. Just build a modest car with an electric powerplant and battery storage. Then stop.

      Fire any designer who tells you AI could improve the product.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Think this is the idea behind the GM Ultium platform (and probably others). They always held out “skateboard” as the goal, although I don’t know if that’s still a thing. Create essentially wheels and a plank that include all the power and drive components, modify to a small set of sizes, and crank them out by the millions. Then each car is a unique body and interior on top of the “skateboard”. As the platform gets to scale, you can drive the cost down, while still making unique cars on top of it - including low end cars

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fire any designer who tells you AI could improve the product.

        That would be pretty dumb. It’s entirely possible to use AI in the design and engineering phase without AI being in the product that’s delivered to the customer. It’s also entirely possible for AI to be used in areas like crash mitigation, improving the handling in poor road conditions, or optimizing charging speed to improve battery life. Those uses of AI are largely invisible but offer a tangible improvement to the vehicle without being what anyone would consider luxurious. Choosing to ignore a design option because it sounds like something trendy is a great way to design a product that’s a worse value for the money.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          AI in the vehicle, he means. Obviously ML models are useful for crash data, don’t be a pedant.

          • eronth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I mean, I interpreted it the way they seem to have as well. Not being a pedant, I literally just read it different.

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              OP could have been more clear, but it’s not unusual for people to take the worst possible interpretation in order to debate something no one was arguing.

              What this entire thread is about is just giving us a 2005-2010 era car that’s electric. An audio deck with B/T only. No wifi, no Internet connectivity to the manufacturer, all the Laas nonsense with the updates and shit.

              Just a vehicle that happens to be electric, not a computer on wheels.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ai is unnecessary in all those topics. Classical sensing, detection/ response algos are all sufficient.

          An LLM or Siri is useless, which is what I’m saying to discard