Then you are not paying attention. Look how the corporate Democrats cozyed up to the neocons and the Cheneys. They really don’t like Trump. The CIA establishment is deep blue. The party switched.
C. Wright Mills https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/27993/chapter/211702330
I don’t care if people can’t tolerate different perspectives on the left and feel the compulsion to cast out and silence dissent.
That is genuinely what it looks like to me. I pay attention.
He really did go through all that shaming and embattlement. Think of the stress and the assassination attempt. There should be a price paid to the victor when the opponent he overcame would have done to him even more than he already went through. He will bring the fight to the Deep State. Listen to the actual policy decisions.
Just for a couple of examples, tell me you don’t you think that the policy for the IGs to be physically separated from who they are regulating and for Federal institutions to be decentralized from the NW corridor aren’t great ideas in so many ways.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Mozi sat is such a cool idea. https://spacenews.com/china-is-developing-a-quantum-communications-satellite-network/
Quantum entropy might even defeat timewave…
They made a mistake. As history proves, a big one. But any technical company could. So did the makers of cyclon. Apple or Windows could. The AI could exterminate us all as useless humans with low worth. The values of the current CEO should matter if they translate into real world policies, such as, defending human rights.
Also a nickname for Molybdenum which makes Iron stronger like torrifying Signal makes encrypted communication stronger by protecting metadata from interception.
yes, the more layers of security, the better, even if it is just a futile matter of time to consume the time of an ATP.
Ah, that must be it. 2FA is still a very good security feature to have.
But there is nothing only you know that is still useful because a secret must be shared in order to be useful (unless you just have full disk encryption and then when it is unlocked and network connected, it is still vulnerable). In short, admins could change your password since you are not the sole admin of your own server but then you would have to have mass appeal to be “useful”, i.e. popular.
In theory, Tim Cook might have a keybearer who could usurp the throne with all the proprietary OEM crypto keys that only the Company knows, but everyone knows who the CEO is and the keybearer could get in big trouble unless he had an army…
Things can be changed on the server side and the network is not the same as the device: these are technology truths some people refuse to ever understand.
No, nothing shady. Just was notified there was a mistake on the server end. Perhaps tmi to elaborate…
This is what I thought. I keep telling people they don’t exclusively own their passwords / security tokens once they give it to a site.
If I shared encrypted info that I kept encrypted, I guess it would still be mine but no one could then read it.
This is what I thought. I keep telling people they don’t exclusively own their passwords / security tokens once they give it to a site. Salted hashes to obscure the pw don’t even matter since the admin could also bypass that. Tanks for the validation.
Great idea. Who didn’t like the Colbert Report? Could turn out like a right-wing populist Repor!
But he’s got a serious side. You know what those globalists are doing…