Holy shit, microplastics are defined as fragments smaller than 5mm??? I thought it’s way smaller, 5mm is big enough to see with your naked eye!
Holy shit, microplastics are defined as fragments smaller than 5mm??? I thought it’s way smaller, 5mm is big enough to see with your naked eye!
How does the math work out on that? Both are fairly mature, I don’t believe that either application takes a considerable amount of development effort to maintain. And taking features from Wordpad and putting them into Notepad has a time and effort cost.
What’s a sane, dynamically typed language?
Not to rub it in, but in my forties could be read as almost the entirety of the modern web was developed during my adulthood.
Absolutely nothing… This article literally just says that somebody on an internet forum pointed out that what might happen is that if your account has been around longer than the average lifespan then they’ll investigate and maybe terminate it after determining it’s no longer owned by the original account owner. Valve today doesn’t have the support capacity to perform this kind of investigation. Valve in 50-60 years will be an entirely different beast. This speculation means nothing.
deleted by creator
This level of effort is probably geared more towards those who create the torrents, not those who consume them.
And the of is an optional field for if they have an onlyfans
Testing scams
Any non-scams yet? Or is it safe to assume anything that looks like a scam, is one?
Computer monitors are significantly more expensive for the same size and are overkill for the applications TVs are generally used for.
I’m imagining a scenario where you’re working on a feature that changes the DB state (e.x. introduces a new DB migration that changes some columns) and the bug is on an unrelated part of the code from your feature. In this hypothetical, going back to the state of the upstream branch would make your local environment non functional, and the bug is on an unrelated part of the code. Fairly specific scenario but hey, you can worktree for that. It’s not particularly thorough, though.
I think they meant “all of this is what might happen next”
But yeah even then social media will still continue to somehow have an ever increasing number of “users”
I sympathize with this. People on the spectrum already have a hard time just living, then they have the extra hurdle of having a hard time communicating their hard time. It feels very human to want to hide the struggle, it makes you feel more like you belong in the world and that you are just one of the other billions out there being “normal” and doing “normal” things. That’s a longing that I’ve felt, but I’m fortunate enough to not have felt it to the degree your father seems to have. I hope you and your brother find a way to get through to him.
Yeah, what do people expect? It’s not like they own massive, self-sufficient data centers on several continents.
I mean, it’s just like collecting baseball cards. Just because I enjoy collecting them, doesn’t mean I inherently have to jerk off to them more than the next guy
I believe they call that ~ ~ a m b i e n c e ~ ~
Honestly kinda genius
And that’s really what all these guys saying “AI will take er jobs” don’t understand. Good programmers are not just good coders, coding is really the easy part. They’re also good analysts and listeners. I understand what he’s saying - if you spend time accruing specific domain knowledge instead of computer science then you can perhaps make better, bespoke solutions because the “coding” can be handled by AI. But in present day, AI makes garbage code all the time and you’ll be left there not being able to do amything about it because it doesn’t make any sense to you. So who do you call? Someone who can code. Even if we get to this hypothetical dream scenario where you tell an AI to do something and it just does it perfect (gigantic IF), who’s making that AI? The interface for it? The important safety nets to make sure it doesn’t go on a rampage? Itself? Too much context is already lost in conversations between humans, let alone an AI. I can think of one kind of AI that would be able to do it perfectly though (assuming AIs could be perfected, that is), and that’s an AI pre-equipped with full understanding of the domain. But then in that case, why do you need the human in the mix at all?
Doing this gives big bow to the machine energy for me, I don’t like it.