The problem with your argument is that it is 100% possible to get ChatGPT to produce verbatim extracts of copyrighted works.
Exactly! This is the core of the argument The New York Times made against OpenAI. And I think they are right.
Yep. He plays Frasier
Props to you for grasping the concept of wet bulb temperature and getting why it’s always lower or equal to the dry bulb temperature. It’s not exactly obvious why that’s the case.
I fell in love with that car the moment I saw it. The two-tone versions with the carbon fibre exposed are chef’s kiss
I’m also partial to Sync. It’s impressive how much of the UX was kept in making the transition to the Fediverse. I honestly can’t tell the difference between the previous Reddit client and the current Lemmy client
I used to think like this but now I realise that being in power is much harder than I thought, especially in the context of a democracy. Inevitably, in order to get something done, you usually need the cooperation of your political opponents, which usually requires to make compromises that you’re uncomfortable with or make you go back on campaign promises.
That said, I think I could do a better job than Trump since I think I could at least manage to not put myself in so much legal trouble.
So if we were to point fingers to anyone, who would it be?
Hello friend
This is not confusing. AT ALL!