me neither. can USA news put the state if they’re not going to say which country it’s in

flyfishing

be quieter than you think you should

ok

ok

ok

ok

ok

so by “deport”, does that mean " imprison in another country"?

so by “deport”, does that mean " imprison in another country"?

not everyone. and some people build their own or have ways of mitigating surveillance capitalism

be aware, everything you say around amazon, apple, alphabet, meta, and any other corporate trash products are being sold, trained on, and sent to your local alphabet agency. it’s been this way for a while, but this is a nice reminder to know when to speak and when to listen

be aware, everything you say around amazon, apple, alphabet, meta, and any other corporate trash products are being sold, trained on, and sent to your local alphabet agency. it’s been this way for a while, but this is a nice reminder to know when to speak and when to listen

commenting to boost activity on this

www.businessinsider.com

CIA to hold regular talks with Russia’s top spy agency

Mia Jankowicz

3 - 4 minutes

Russia’s intelligence agency said its chief spoke to his CIA counterpart on Tuesday.

It’s a marked shift in posture and is the first reported contact between the pair in over two years.

It comes as a US-proposed cease-fire deal between Russia and Ukraine is on the table.

Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service said that its chief had spoken to the head of the CIA, in the first reported contact between the pair in over two years.

In the Tuesday call, it said the two agency chiefs agreed to maintain regular contact in the future, a marked shift in relations that comes at a time when a cease-fire deal with Ukraine is on the table.

It came the same day that Ukraine signaled that it was ready to accept a US proposal for an immediate 30-day cease-fire deal with Russia.

Key moments from Trump’s address to Congress

Emily Ferris, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, told BI that the call was “significant,” as the two senior leaders had not spoken in several years.

According to the Russian intelligence agency, known as the SVR, its director, Sergey Naryshkin, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe spoke about how they could interact on matters of common interest and the resolution of crisis situations.

The CIA did not immediately respond to Business Insider’s request for comment.

Tulsi Gabbard — who has shared anti-Ukraine talking points in the past — was confirmed as President Donald Trump’s Director of National Intelligence last month, a rule that oversees multiple intelligence agencies, including the CIA.

The latest move comes amid a general rapprochement between Trump and Russia, while relations between the US and its traditional allies in Europe have soured.

The US temporarily paused all US intelligence-sharing with Ukraine last week, but reversed that on Tuesday.

Ferris told BI that the US may be using the calls with Russia as a “carrot” in negotiations.

“Russia’s desire to be regarded on an equal footing with other countries it considers to be major powers, particularly the US and China, often drives its foreign policy decision-making,” she said.

But she added that the link “could be severed at any time, especially should Russia delay on a decision about the cease-fire.”

Edward Hunter Christie, a senior research fellow at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs, told BI that “America is deliberately opening itself to being influenced by official Russian voices.”

“Russia will exploit this,” he added.

Christie said that the announcement of resumed contact between the SVR and CIA “is the further confirmation of the Trump administration’s openly stated intention to have a completely new relationship with Russia, based on collaboration and coordination between the two states on what they can agree on.”

wait, did he share the triangle or just the Washington post article?

no good. beyond using a VPN and dnssec, how can end users protect themselves from this?

so a more accurate way of phrasing this would be, “taxes and fees are 400% more than the flight”

sorry, was assuming this was broader than just federal. thanks for clarifying

do you think would influence developers to make their projects open source, with more leaning towards copy left licenses? they won’t make much money off the code alone anyways, so might as well try to make others not profit either

certain states banned them. this would federally make it illegal to ban them at the state level, as far as I understand. you know, states’ rights and all