Every time an “eat the rich” topic comes up, the moderators whip out the banhammer. They hide behind some justification about how the cops are toooootaly gonna raid their servers if they aren’t explicitly supportive of oligarchs, but really it’s simple cowardice that shouldn’t be rewarded. Don’t pre-comply with fascists and all that…

Why are we still using .world?

deleted by creator

(Disclaimer: this is not a fully formed counter-argument to your statement, merely my thought-vomit).

As a kid growing up in the 90’s you wouldn’t believe the amount of times my parents and teachers vehemently insisted to me that I MUST do dictionary lookup drills because there’s no way I would just always have access to an electronic dictionary in my pocket. I was also told that I absolutely HAD to be fast at paper-based multiplication and long division. It’s not like I would just carry a calculator around with me everywhere I go, that would be insane!

Uhh wrong thread?

I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to lie if the text is yellow and scrolls from the bottom of the screen in 3D.

All parables and proverbs are made up, with old characters added to give fake legitimacy.

1/10 no tutorial on how to jump over an office chair.

Holy moly those specs are remarkably similar to my 1st generation Prius.

There is only one single core belief in fascism. There must be an “in” group that the state protects, and an “out” group that the state oppresses. There are zero other rules. This means that the definition of the in group is completely arbitrary and fluid based on what helps the strongman at the top. If you ever question the definition of the in group, you are automatically part of the out group.

Francis’s legacy of doing absolutely nothing and continuing to fund and protect known child abusers?

In the piracy world, “fed” is short for Federal Bureau of Investigation police officer.

Yea, they complained about multiple people in a stall which is typically legitimately weird behavior and then Paul Blart, mall TERF took it on himself to be a bigot for reasons completely unrelated to customer complaints.

No, that’s literally not how binding arbitration works in the US.

Where does the article say that?

I’m sure there’s some bullshit fine print about binding arbitration. It’s so cool that corporations can just say “we waive your fundamental rights because we feel like it” and it’s just…legal. Greatest country on earth.

There’s and endless list of games people have complained about changing during early access. It’s a stupid idea. Don’t preorder games.

Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. Too bad your “just asking questions” bad faith conservative drivel doesn’t work here and gets pushback. Maybe Twitter is more your speed.

Please use a good-faith interpretation of my question and explain how projecting your bigoted opinions on others is rational.

How is minding your own business irrational?