![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
That title is really hard to parse.
I kept trying to figure out whose head got snapped.
That title is really hard to parse.
I kept trying to figure out whose head got snapped.
How do you make it safe and inviting while also protecting anonymity?
Some anonymous users are prone to pretty awful behavior, and non anonymous users will be profiled.
China filters every byte of Internet traffic in and out of the country.
It seems naive to think they can’t accomplish the same thing for a GitHub mirror.
That’s the whole point of this: they will automatically filter that out, and this is an impotent, though well intended, gesture.
You started here
Personally I think it’s photosynthesis.
Now you’re here
The failure to develop photosynthesis
I think you got it! Good job!
Regardless: photosynthesis is a possible solution to avoid the filter. Not the filter itself.
You can’t filter something in
What do you look for?
Your answer doesn’t make sense.
“Photosynthesis” is a positive development for life. The great filter must be a negative development: it’s a filter or a barrier that keeps life from achieving long term extra terrestrial survival.
So “climate change” would be an answer. Or “fuel depletion” (to which photosynthesis may be a solution). But the filter is the mechanism by which life forms are prevented from progressing.
Bones prove you existed.
But the absence of bones does not mean that you didn’t.
It sounds like it all needs liquidation
Short answer: no
Longer answer: if it were that simple, then money laundering would not be a billion dollar industry.
“when people find out how I act, they don’t like me!”
She’s already pledged the money. It’s as good as paid.
So it’s like a Grindr alternative?
In a divorce case you need testimony to understand what the other spouse did.
In a slander case what evidence does Biden need to testify about?
All the evidence is a matter of public record.
For the one hour that it takes to provide testimony and cross examination? Yes.
This is his lawyer’s time, not POTUS’ time
Of course the DOJ would be uninvolved.
I’m talking about a personal suit by Biden: he’s the victim of the slander.
It would be the best money Biden could spend. Nothing else is going to stop the reckless dishonesty by Trump supporters and attorneys.
I didn’t know that! Great link!
But “reckless disregard for truth” seems to be perfectly suitable here
And it’s not about money. It’s about forcing consequences on attorneys who are willing to make insane arguments to help Trump.
Because if Trump dies then we have a lot less to worry about