Many of the machines in question will have safe mode walled off for security reasons anyway.
Many of the machines in question will have safe mode walled off for security reasons anyway.
I really have a hard time deciding if that is the scandal the article makes it out to be (although there is some backpedaling going on). The crucial point is: 8% of the decisions turn out to be wrong or misjudged. The article seems to want us to think that the use of the algorithm is to blame. Yet, is it? Is there evidence that a human would have judged those cases differently? Is there evidence that the algorithm does a worse job than humans? If not, then the article devolves onto blatant fear mongering and the message turns from “algorithm is to blame for deaths” into “algorithm unable to predict the future in 100% of cases”, which of course it can’t…
But you are only allowed to report things that seem important to Americans in any community that might be visited by Americans. Come on, everybody knows that.
/S
I got a toddler at home. I’m very familiar with their product range :P
In a country that has neither got anything to do with Trump nor with the shooting… Someone needs to pamper a certain voter demographic, I’d say
Oh by Zeus,.may the gods have mercy for I have none.
I refuse to read anything after the headline to keep my blood below boiling point. Did I miss anything?
Thats the issue. Not only with poverty, but with overspending in general. Usually, money savin measures take time to become noticeable, since there is always some inertia in money flows (things that were already die when the saving measures were started, subscriptions, etc), so people who overspent will immediately see a drastic downfall of their living standards when they start saving, but still overshoot their budget for at least a few weeks usually, until all the overspending is paid off and the savings start to kick in. That’s a really dangerous phase because people often struggle to understand if they are doing it right or not.
So, we take the magazine diet of the month approach yet again? Instead of learning healthy spending habits, we barge in with the extremest measures we can find, inevitably fail and try the next needlessly extreme thing, repeating the cycle until we have lost so much self esteem in the process that we tell ourselves that we just aren’t made to save money?
Well then, this website over there told me that they have got shiny new shirts reduced from 1899,- to just 15 bucks, but only if I order 65 of them in the next.two minutes. Take my credit card! I’ll start no spending year right after! Pinky promise!
Imagine being presented with an aircraft. You bloody well know what it does and you get permission to disassemble the whole thing to your heart’s content. How big of a task do you think it’d still be to be able to work out how the winged metal tube works and why it does what it does when it does it?
Exactly.
The absurd waste of resources VMs bring… LXC and Docker a godsend in that regard.
Are VMs really simpler? I’d say no.
This goes for most LLM things. The time it takes to get the word calculator to write a letter would have been easily used to just write the damn letter.
We hate your music we hate you, too we got our resons, for what we do
you cannot hide, you stupid fucks We really think your music sucks
We hate - Sworn Enemy
Love how the tone alternates between rage and hate on the one side and this rational description on the other
When I hear that lonesome whistle
It’s always funny to see how inept and childish those companies seem when regulatory bodies don’t just stop pursuing them after their first haphazard attempt to circumvent the rules.
If we don’t enforce the already existing rules to a meaningful degree… what’s stopping people from ignoring the new ones?
But the minefields are a banger scnr
I’d rather troubleshoot for days than try to reboot or check cables.
That’s what happens around any toilet in a 2km radius when Taco Bell has a major sale.