Ah, I did not get that since that would leave different marks, so it did not add up to me. Thank you for explaining.

I do not get it. What is it showing us?

No worries

Firefox has that feature built in, no?

Sorry is the absolute number is slightly off. I thought the round number made it clear that it was not supposed to be a precise estimate but a general “this is how irrelevant they are compared to normal loses”.

That’s on the level of “everything could be made up to fool me” or matrix kind of stuff. You can simply be a poll worker yourself.

Today 8000 Tomorrow 7000 …6000 … etc.

Interesting. Thank you. How do you ID?

How is trust involved in that process?

… Why is it blurred if she is wearing a bra…?

Interesting, given the stories of people voting several times by just going to different places.

How do they move from wherever they die to the general poop area?

You know how people outside the USA vote? They go there, show their ID, get a tick on the list of voters, and do the voting.

Happened before in general? Or specially to me? Everything as is exactly everything or just general things (getting up, working, …)?

So many options that mean entirely different things.

Odd that GPT (and of course all the LLMs too) only got better so far…

No, it was just suddenly completely irrelevant. The answers of the first chat bot that supposedly “beat” it are a complete joke. And yes, I just wrote exactly the same with the goal getting moved, next it has to invent relativity or it’s not intelligent. Absurd.

So every human that does not come up with something entirely new that has never been before is not intelligent? Are people with an IQ of 80 not intelligent anymore, just bio-machines?Seriously, where do you draw the line? You keep shifting the goal to harder and harder to reach things that at this point most people would not fit anymore. When GPT5 will then also do that, what will you say? That it did not invent the car? Come up with relativistic effects?

What of what you say does not apply to humans? They apply patterns of behavior in response to some input. Picked up by learning them. Including people talking online. They are always biased on some way. Some will acknowledge their bias and change it if you give them context.

GPT can literally create simulations. I have used it to do exactly that, specifically for 2D heat conducting with coupled mass transport and reaction kinetics.

If GPT4o is still not what you would call AI, then what is? You can have conversations with it, the Turing test is completely irrelevant all of the sudden.

Because people do not care. It is that simple.