Speaking of mildly interesting, I’d be mildly interested to know how much spray foam one could put inside that vending machine.
Speaking of mildly interesting, I’d be mildly interested to know how much spray foam one could put inside that vending machine.
Societally, is shunning still a reasonable approach for insurrectionists who for whatever reason seem like they will continue despite judgements leveled against them?
“Johnston, 55, could see a maximum sentence of five years in prison, but sentencing guidelines suggest a from eight to 14 months in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for Oct. 7.”
Short- and long-term neuropsychiatric outcomes in long COVID in South Korea and Japan https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01895-8
What are we using these days to get full access? Y’all are an amusing bunch, AND this looks like an important paper.
And popping popcorn with our phones. LoL those were the days.
To some extent it depends on the species of bee. There are over 6000 species of bee in N. America. Planting for the benefit of bees is a thing, tho’. Honey bees are but one specie, and not native.
https://www.gardendesign.com/flowers/bees.html
https://learnbees.com/best-flowers-for-bees/
https://www.countryliving.com/gardening/g32157369/flowers-that-attract-bees/
https://www.epicgardening.com/pollinator-garden-plants/
I’ve not vetted the above sites, but they should be sufficient to get your started on ‘planting for pollinators.’ It’s not just about bees, there are many species that have symbiotic relationships with flowering plants.
Your’s was a ‘small question’ about which which volumes been written. Generally it’s best to plant native species of plants to attract pollinators in your local area. If you talk to a local greenhouse/ garden center, and/or master gardener’s in your area that would also be helpful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025
Executive Summary: Project 2025 envisions widespread changes across the government, particularly economic and social policies and the role of the federal government and its agencies. The plan proposes taking partisan control of the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Commerce, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC), dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and sharply reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuel production.[7][12] The blueprint seeks to institute tax cuts,[13] though its writers disagree on the wisdom of protectionism.[14] Project 2025 recommends abolishing the Department of Education, whose programs would be either transferred to other agencies, or terminated.[15][16] Funding for climate research would be cut while the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be reformed along conservative principles.[17][18] The Project urges government to explicitly reject abortion as health care[19][20] and eliminate coverage of emergency contraception under the Affordable Care Act.[21] The Project seeks to infuse the government with elements of Christianity.[6] It proposes criminalizing pornography,[22] removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity,[22][23] and terminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs,[3][23] as well as affirmative action.[24] Some conservatives and Republicans have criticized the plan for its stance on climate change[25] and foreign trade.[14] Other critics believe Project 2025 is rhetorical “window-dressing” for what would be four years of personal vengeance at any cost.[26] The project’s authors also acknowledged that most of the proposals would require the Republican Party to control both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate.[26] Other aspects of the plan have recently been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and would face court challenges, while others still are norm-breaking proposals that might survive court challenges.[27]
The Project recommends the arrest, detention, and deportation of undocumented immigrants living in the United States.[28] It promotes capital punishment and the speedy “finality” of those sentences.[29] Dans acknowledged it was “counterintuitive” to recruit so many to join the government to shrink it, but pointed out the need for a future president to “regain control” of the government.[3] Although the project cannot by law promote a specific presidential candidate, many contributors have close ties to Donald Trump and his 2024 presidential campaign.[30][31] The Washington Post called the project “the most detailed articulation of what a second Trump term would look like.”[32] While initially[when?] the Trump campaign said the project aligned well with their Agenda 47 proposals,[26] the Project has increasingly caused friction with the Trump campaign which has generally avoided specific policy proposals that can be used to criticize him.[32] In July 2024, Trump disavowed Project 2025.[33]
The sort of ‘military’ style to the guy’s jacket makes me think you are on to something.
“trump supporters” are not a monobloc. And different people value different information in different ways, for their own reasons. We need to peel off as many trump voters as possible. Discouraging statements like “trump supporters do not care about this” help to get trump elected. If you want fascism, u/nutsack, that’s how we get fascism.
I don’t make things up, I just look them up.
I’m just reading the article, as you were also able to do, and it says, “On 8 June, officers were made aware via CCTV of a man, Bray, walking down Queens Road, Nuneaton, with the sword in his hand. Bray approached officers with the blade visible, at which point he was arrested.” Bold added for emphasis. If I were out in public in the UK, and if I happened to have a bladed implement, I’d keep it out of sight. Especially if there were police anywhere nearby. But hey, you can do as you please. Have a nice day!
This “victim surcharge” would be termed court cost or court fee in the US.
Not for simply having, but for brandishing said bladed device as the police approached. That’s the law, in that city. As the officer said, “It is possible to find fidget toys that aren’t six-inch blades. It is possible not to walk down the street holding them out in front of you. With a bit more self-awareness, Bray could have avoided contact with us completely.” Bray brought this on himself, and could have avoided any contact with the police. He chose otherwise.
Which, of course, explains why all blind people are thin. And opens a whole new avenue for weight control. We’ll make kitchen light switches that only work within certain BMI ranges. /s
None of them! All of my secret conspiracies are SECRET!
Ah that explains the Hat Bag/ Bag Hat. For it to work properly one would need to have a dent in one’s skull the size of one’s cargo. Think of the hat gag from last week, and sneaking a roast chicken into the theater. ;-)
get enough in the right place, and my hope is that the ammo will stay inside the vending machine.