Ok 👍

It doesn’t matter that they’re in the same industry. They’re not competing against each other, and it’s an antitrust case.

Russia will send you to the meat grinder soon, not to worry

I’m not sure how Uber is relevant to Google’s antitrust case, they’re two different companies in two different sectors. Google does not have a ride-sharing service.

Maybe changing the subject to something other than Google shows the cracks in this article and your motives?

60hz on a 2024 flagship is just sad.

Good for him, although I’m almost positive he used ozempic (you can see it in his face). Unfortunately knowing him, I doubt he’d admit something like that which sucks because I’m sure there’s a lot of people that think they can eat like him but stay skinny with no effort other than some exercise.

It’s also only on the unlimited plan.

A government small enough to fit in your bedroom.

Userbenchmark has always been trash

Intel’s chipmaking business may have run into a bit of a snag, as recent tests using the company’s next-gen manufacturing process have failed, according to Reuters.

To carry out the tests, Intel reportedly sent Broadcom’s silicon wafers — or the components used as a semiconductor’s base — through its more efficient 18A manufacturing process. After examining the results, Broadcom found that the process isn’t ready for high-volume production, Reuters reports.

The 18A process is a key part of Intel’s plan to reestablish itself as a leading chipmaker. Intel has been developing this technology for a few years now, and it plans to start producing chips using the process with major partners like Microsoft starting next year. However, the company has had a troubled past few months, as it reported $1.6 billion in losses in the second quarter of 2024 and announced layoffs affecting more than 15,000 workers. It’s also dealing with widespread issues affecting its 13th and 14th Gen CPUs.

Huh, I actually do think that there are two things AI is ready to replace: CEOs and MrBeast.

deemix

I use lidarr on steriods (it has deemix built in, but deemix seems to have been abandoned. it still works for now though) to download flac, and then I scrobble what I’m listening to with Last.fm. I’ve found some great new music through last.fm’s suggestions.

Absolutely, in that the more software in a vehicle, the more likely it is to brick once a company folds. ICE cars are less likely since they don’t have most of the software, but there are some that are computers on wheels still (and I’m sure the amount will continue to increase).

Uhh, plenty of people still use them (it’s still the default for many gaming monitors), and for 32:9 displays you absolutely need it curved or it’s basically unusable. I don’t think they’re going away any time soon, because they’re not a “trend”.

It quite literally is political. It’s not legal for them because China but Meta, X, Snap, etc can do the same thing (plus more, Cambridge Analytica, for example) and be fine.

That is the definition of political, and anyone that told you it was to protect your privacy was lying to you, just like this article explains.

Also, do you think China has to buy the data from these companies? And even if they do buy it, what makes you think they do it all above board? Do you think they won’t just bribe and steal their way to your data?

The problem was never TikTok alone. The problem is social media corps altogether, and the fact that the government doesn’t actually give a shit about our privacy (probably because of the lobbying that these companies do, also explained in the article). If the US government cared, we’d have laws preventing much of this data from being collected in the first place.

Did you read the article, which mostly talks about these companies as a whole and not just TikTok?

Ah, I see. Annoying.

Was it the news community or here? Pretty much all of my posts get filtered on news for some reason.

I only see Trump claiming that it was “shocking”, is that what you mean?