It’s not just about facts: Democrats and Republicans have sharply different attitudes about removing misinformation from social media::One person’s content moderation is another’s censorship when it comes to Democrats’ and Republicans’ views on handling misinformation.

  • Franklin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can honestly tell you that no one thought they were they were skeptical of the source, once they were authentic not one outlet called them fake.

    And report after report shows the opposite of what you claim. Right wing News is favored on almost all online platforms and much of network news

    • mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were never able to be called unauthenticated. They were published with DKIM signatures from the beginning.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        you’re confusing skepticism with oppression people taking a moment to believe something from Julian assange isn’t censorship, He’s not exactly the most trustworthy of sources no matter how much proof he brings up but once it was clear and it was pretty quick I think pretty much everyone bought on

        • mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Has WikiLeaks every published a false leak? Why would he not be trustworthy?