• Mchugho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They also test for obviousness mate.

    If you think you can do better than a patent office examiner get on it because they’re extremely well paid.

    Or maybe you could stop and draw a line under what you think is correct. Have you ever considered the possibility that actually you haven’t got the first clue how to properly analyse a patent because it’s a profession that requires extensive training and eye to detail?

    I know on the internet it’s fun to pretend you actually know everything because everything is a Google search away but to even properly contextualise and separate good patents and bad patents isn’t a skill you can just pick up in 5 minutes to win an argument.