Something big is happening, as Reddit seems to have purged literally every NSFW sub they know. Reason is always “unmoderated” despite some of the banned subreddits being fully moderated.


Edit: seems to have been a bug in automation (thanks @[email protected]):

https://old.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/1ii67mt/_/mb3fewv

It’s still a good reminder on how quickly a community (or communities) thousands of people enjoy and in some cases rely upon can disappear.

  • BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I mean, ffs. #notallcishet? I don’t get how people who are being oppressed and all lumped together under one description (which you all definitely are) can be so nonchalant throwing around broad strokes like that.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Can you please learn and understand that when people are frustrated they often use a little hyperbole? It’s very selfish to respond to people like this.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You got a problem with trans people? No? Then it wasn’t talking about you. Christ, is that hard to understand?

      When a group of people makes an “us vs them” against a minority, it forces the minority to use that language back. As a cishet person, your identity is being used as a weapon to harm trans people regardless if you’re doing anything. Ignorance of the minorities plight can be weaponized to do more harm and that ignorance can be shielded through appeals to normalcy and tradition.

      When you respond to that language with “not all cishet people” you signal that your support is contingent on you not losing anything (your ignorance is one of the things you can lose). Which can and will be used to weaponize more harm against the minority group.

      • BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I realize that I’m outnumbered here and that this is apparently an unpopular opinion, but nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

        You’ve both been quite rude to me and I’m done engaging you, but that’s the full extent of my point and I’m unconvinced by your rebuttals.

        Ciao now 🫡

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

          Legal documents are being made to say that all x (transgender individuals) are now y (the wrong gender) because someone else (the government) is making them say so.

          • BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’ve never disputed that. I don’t know how reiterating that fact in any way supports the idea that it “forces” transgender individuals to use the same language to describe “all cishet” people.

            That was my point. It always has been.

            If I were visually impaired and protesting unsuccessfully for better accessibility in my work environments, I can’t imagine why I would make a claim in any capacity including the language “all sighted people”.

    • Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Lol was that hashtag ironic? You know “not all men” is frequently referenced as a critique about men who can’t hear criticism of gender equality because “not all men”? As a cishet dude: calm down, their point is valid and your reaction is cringe