I had two Samsung flagship phones, one (S20FE) had an optical fingerprint reader and the other (S22) had an ultrasonic one. Both of them somewhat regularly failed to read my finger, were slower than a fingerprint reader on the power button and are more expensive/complex to build. They won’t work with cheap 3rd party screen replacements and some screen protectors as well.

Meanwhile my $90 Android phone has a fingerprint reader on the power button. It never fails and I never have to perfectly place my finger on the sensor area to get it to work. It just seems like the perfect place to put a fingerprint sensor, so why do phone manufacturers keep using in-display fingerprint readers over the cheaper alternative?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    My Pixel 7 has the fingerprint reader behind the screen and it’s awful. Unless you’ve got the greasiest fingers of anyone who ever lived, it fails to log you in.

    Instead the face recognition kicks in, and then fails when you try to make a payment, asking for your fingerprint again.

    It’s fucking aggravating.

    My crappy old Huawei thing has a separate panel for fingerprints and it never failed to work.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      They said the same about the 6 but honestly it works pretty well for me most of the time.

      Sorry, I have God fingers I guess. blessed by the finger maiden.

    • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The pixels from 6 to 8 use an optical fingerprint scanner, and optical scanners almost universally suck, because they use a tiny camera to see your finger through the display on your phone. Most phones including the pixel 9’s include an ultrasonic fingerprint scanner, which is more reliable, faster, doesn’t flashbang you in the dark, and has the potential to be much bigger (think lower half of the phone is the fingerprint scanner).

      I haven’t had trouble with under display fingerprint scanners since I had my S23 (ultrasonjc), but my previous has an optical one and it was the worst thing I’d used.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve used standalone optical readers before, and the ones that worked well had a slightly tacky rubbery-plastic layer on them, that I think helps with making the fingerprint stand out. Obviously can’t do that on a screen, because it’d be weird.