• zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was narrowly taking issue with the comparison to how humans learn, I really don’t care about copyrights.

    • Sam Clemente@allthingstech.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      @zbyte64 where am I wrong? The process is effectively the same: you get a set of training data (a textbook) and a set of validation data (a test) and voila, I’m trained

      To learn how to draw an image of a thing, you look at the thing a lot (training data) and try sketching it out (validation data) until it’s right

      How the data is acquired is irrelevant, I can pirate the textbook or trespass to find a particular flower, that doesn’t mean I’m learning differently than someone who paid for it

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Do we assume everything read in a textbook is correct? When we get feedback on drawing, do we accept the feedback as always correct and applicable? We filter and groom data for the AI so it doesn’t need to learn these things.