• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    What? I write some code and then delete it and I’m in trouble because I didn’t preserve it?? I really don’t understand this concept at all

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      3 months ago

      You sold someone some code that you then rendered inoperable by actions beyond their control; that’s what you’d get in trouble for. Delete your own code all you like.

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s a different statement than you made before. I am also against disabling something someone paid for. But what did you mean by

        The code can be stored without needing servers to be kept open

        I have to store code? Can’t I delete my own code?

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you sell someone a game that relies on a server you own, and did not advertise clearly that you were selling a service, not a good (something you own), and then break that product for the customer without any possibility of them repairing their good, and you delete the code that could’ve fixed it, you’d be sorta commiting fraud.

          If you abandon a product that was sold as a good, and it became inoperable due to forces unrelated to you, you’d be in the clear.

          • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Right, so an MMO charging a monthly fee shouldn’t need to make their game available to everyone if they stop charging people the fee and shut it down? Because that’s what I think too.

              • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                But the FAQ on the stop killing games site specifically says this applies to MMOs. That’s why I disagree. Specifically for the part about MMOs.

                • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  A few things. People use MMOs as an example of a thing that cannot be run by users, and the FAQ calls out that this is demonstrably false. Second, there’s the idea of a good and a service, and games have been happy to blur this line over the past decade and change. When you pay a monthly subscription fee, there’s no question that you’re paying for a service; your service ends when that month is up. The problem comes from selling you things as though they’re goods but then revoking access to them at some unknown time in the future as though it were a service or lease that you had no idea when it would expire. So this campaign also demands that if you’re selling microtransactions like a cosmetic mount in an MMO, you need to be able to use that mount after the servers are no longer supported, and as we’ve already proven, it is definitely actually possible for ordinary people to run MMO servers, even if they’re hosting them for a few hundred or a few thousand people rather than hundreds of thousands or millions.

                  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I agree with that. That’s what I meant in my original comment that applying this to all games is ridiculous. Subscription based MMOs are a game but this initiative shouldn’t apply to them.

            • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              In the ideal world they could release the code open source, there’s no money lose on that.

        • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          That is not what is being discussed and was never being discussed. You’re sounding like you’re being pedantic to try to pick a fight

          • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m being specific because this is being intended as a law everyone must follow. “All games need to be available forever” is very vague. How will this vague law be applied in practice? People brought up the idea of eternal code preservation. Alright. How does that work?

            I’m not picking a fight. I want supporters to explain in vivid detail their expectations because it’s clear not even all the supporters agree on how it would be implemented. Some said it doesn’t apply to MMOs. Some said it does. It needs to be one or the other. That’s not being pedantic, it’s being realistic.

            • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              What the petition says is what it’s asking for. What we want may be different. What European parliament drafts, if we’re so lucky, will be what’s actually the law. The concerns in the petition are quite clearly about how this applies to EU consumer protections, and many of us are interested in that plus the bonus that this will grant to preservation by proxy.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Any company that isn’t completely incompetent has some revision control solution like GitHub. It saves the original and all the changes throughout the life of the code. It’s designed specifically to allow developers to update or even delete code while still maintaining records

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        An indie dev recently lost the source code to their early access game and had to remove it from Steam. If this law was in place, what punishment would they face for their incompetence? It would be rare for a massive company to not have source control, but it probably isn’t uncommon for small first time devs. So now you have a well intentioned law putting regulations in place that hurt small devs and raise the barrier to entry.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          Removing the game from sale is not disabling the game for existing owners. These are two very different problems.

    • Icalasari@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      A game’s code can be submitted to a repository on release to the public to be stored for the sake of preservation. The repository can always be made access on a case by case basis, thus preventing the loss of code and culture while also protecting the IP holder’s rights

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        And every single game dev would be required to do this for the thousands of games released every year? Who would host this massive repository? Who would determine access on a case by case basis? It’s a nice suggestion but mandating this as a law everyone has to follow? Why? I thought this was about consumer protection

        • Icalasari@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Iunno, the Library of Congress in the states seems capable of holding every movie, book, journal, etc.

          I think a way could be found for games in the EU if even the US can manage this for other media

          • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Is that repository required by law? Is every author and director required to follow it or be punished? What if an author only publishes it on their website and then takes the website down and it never makes it to the archive are they in trouble? It’s a nice thing, but mandating it as law is ridiculous.