This really does not sound healthy. The game is released, for a certain amount of money. If people don’t like what they get for their money, they simply should not buy it.

But by now gamers have been so trained to expect to endless content treadmills and all their ilk like mtx and battle passes that publishers/developers get egged on if they don’t work on their game 24/7 and forever.

  • ahal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Nah screw that… don’t buy early access games if you don’t think it’s worth it in it’s current state.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Both are true though.

      If you want to release your game in Early Access, you should expect to update the game and community frequently.

      If you want to buy a game (early access or not), take a look if it’s what you want to play right now, never buy any game, software, service or device that is promising the functionality you want will be coming later. If it does come later, buy it then, never buy on promises.

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Naw screw that. Don’t label it early access if you don’t plan to update it from its current state at a rate that the majority of your fan base expects.

      That said the dev in this article has provided 3 updates in 3 months. They’re totally fine by the expectations of all but the most unreasonable people.

      • IllIIllIllIIIIl@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        Or just don’t buy a game with expectations that don’t match reality and then get mad at other people.

        Typical gamer brain rot

          • IllIIllIllIIIIl@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            Again, typical gamer brain rot

            Obviously not, otherwise this discussion wouldn’t be happening. You get that right? This thread wouldn’t exist and there would be no point to talk about this at all.

            Use some brain cells

            • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              OR you are stupid. I’m just not gonna sugercoat it by pretending adding “gamer” to “brain rot” means anything but you exposing your bias.

              If you wanna call me stupid, just do that. Don’t tell on yourself.

              A gamer is the target audience of the article and this community.

              • IllIIllIllIIIIl@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                24 days ago

                So much entitlement with you lol, yeah and the article is calling you out for being whiney children and demanding things from devs at an unnecessary pace.

                • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  24 days ago

                  The article is attempting to move the established goal posts for expectations. Stop shilling for these guys. You don’t need to carry their water. The devs know this, which is why they’ve kept pace. They’re just bitching about having to.

                  It’s so unreasonable yet we do it. Woe is us.