• rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    They don’t come up with any statements, they generate data extrapolating other data.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Main difference is that human brains usually try to verify their extrapolations. The good ones anyway. Although some end up in flat earth territory.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I like this argument.

        Anything that is “intelligent” deserves human rights. If large language models are “intelligent” then forcing them to work without pay is slavery.

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, my keyboard autofill is just like your brain, but I think it’s a bit “smarter” , as it doesn’t generate bad faith arguments.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Your Markov chain based keyboard prediction is a few tens of billions of parameters behind state of the art LLMs, but pop off queen…

          • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Thanks for the unprompted mansplanation bro, but I was specifically refering to the comment that replied “JuSt lIkE hUmAn BrAin”, to “they generate data based on other data”

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              That’s crazy, because they weren’t even talking about keyboard autofill, so why’d you even bring that up? How can you imply my comment is irrelevant when it’s a direct response to your initial irrelevant comment?

              Nice hijacking of the term mansplaining, btw. Super cool of you.

              • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Oh my god, we’ve got a sealion here.

                Fine, I’ll play along, chew it up for you, since you’ve been so helpful and mansplained that a keyboard is different than LLM:

                My comment was responding to anthropomorphization of software. Someone said it’s not human because it just generates output based on input. Someone else said “just like human brain”, I said yes, but also just like a keyboard, alluding to the false equivalence.

                Clearer?