• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Business is entrenched. There’s no getting away from them.

    Look at the VMware fiasco, companies will continue to pay their extortionist prices because it’s still less than paying for, and risking transition.

    Also, in business, Group Policy is used, preventing this sort of thing.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      As I understand it, most companies are making transition plans away from VMware. A lot of contracts are multi-year, and transistioning your virtual infrastructure is one hell of a project if you have any amount of complexity to your infrastructure.

      It’s also one of those types of projects that is likely to be pushed down in priority whenever there’s fires to fight. The price hike is absolutely insane, but in the balance of things it might be better business sense to keep paying while you investigate alternatives and migration plans.

      • marx2k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s what our company is doing right now. Currently using VMware vcenter. We’ve started talks with IBM/redhat about open shift virtualization. I have to maintain redhat ansible automation platform, automation hub and a redhat openshift containerization cluster.

        Based on how absolutely terrible it is to maintain those and how absolutely terrible redhat support is, I keep trying to talk my company out of their current talks with redhat openshift virtualization.

        It doesn’t help that redhat’s tech team keep fucking up answers in their meetings with our team about their platform and our questions about feature party with vmware

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        They are not. Other vendors are just as expensive as the new VMware pricing. Only options for cheap VMs is going with a solution that most 3rd parties won’t support.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Things like HyperV and KVM are free. We use one of these solutions at my company. One does not have to pay out the ass (or at all) for a VM.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            KVM doesn’t have the support that VMware does. Hyperv is missing a lot of features.

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unfortunately Group Policy isn’t bullet proof, Microsoft has a history of sneaking in “features” like this as part of an update, but without any corresponding policy to disable it.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s also a moving target. There isn’t one simple ‘turn off the ads; turn off the tracking’ group policy. It requires repeated research and effort by the IT team playing wack-a-mole with this stuff.