I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren’t worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

  • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hard disagree!

    Are you saying that you’ve owned both cheap and expensive cars, and that your favorites have always been the cheap ones? That they’ve been more reliable, more comfortable, better-riding, and better-driving? Or, at least, no worse than the expensive ones?

    Yes, more expensive cars are more expensive. They often have a higher cost of ownership. And, sometimes, brands really fuck up and cut corners they shouldn’t, and result an reputational harm that takes years to recover from, long after they’ve fixed the production issues (c.f. Audi in the early 00’s). But, IME, it’s usually worth it, if you can afford it.

    • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Cheap cars definitely are more reliable if you pick the right brands. On all the other points it just doesn’t make enough of a difference to me to justify the enormous cost increase.

      Our $10k used Camry is still kicking ass over ten years later and hasn’t ever needed work more extensive than replacing leaking struts. The reliability truly is astounding.

      EDIT: But, let’s not talk about my camera-buying habits lol

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        let’s not talk about my camera-buying habits lol

        Ah, that’s the perfect hobby if you really hate having money 😅

      • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Our 2016 (new) BMW has never had a major issue. Our 2014 (new) Volvo - which cost half what the BMW did, has almost never not had something going wrong with it. We bought a new Altima many years ago that was less expensive than the Volvo; we had it for several years and it was fine, but it was still in the shop more than this BMW (but less than the Volvo).

        The issue isn’t so much reliability, but what it costs when there is a problem. Fixing the Altima would certainly be cheaper than the same repair of the BMW. The Volvo TCO is higher than the BMW or the Altima.

        I also think you have to be comparing similar years. My sister - who’s 20 years younger than me - is still driving a 1996 Nissan 240SX, and it’s in great chat wasn’t a “cheap” car when it was new, but still. I think cars from last century were more robust.

        • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          The repair cost is ultimately the most significant, that’s true.

          We’ll have to see how statistics play out in the long run: that’s where the non-anecdotal evidence for Toyota’s supremacy comes from.

    • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s not going to be a huge difference between something like a Toyota and a Mercedes other than cost and reliability. You’re paying for the brand.

      • toybastard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        I disagree as well. I think it’d be pretty obvious to anyone who’s sat in each the difference in comfort, ride quality, material choice, technology, and drivetrain refinement between a Corolla and an AMG.

        I would still buy the Corolla though for the reliability - or better yet, a Lexus which kind of has both.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        This person has never driven a Merc.

        There’s a difference between Toyota and Lexus

      • Thevenin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Mercedes is an outlier. Try comparing Toyota with Lexus, Nissan with Infiniti, Chevy with Cadillac, or Ford with Lincoln. In all of these instances, the luxury marques have equivalent or better reliability than their economy counterparts.

        Of course, whether or not the reliability and features are worth the cost is a different question entirely. (I generally lean towards no.)

        • cobra89@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol I don’t think the reliability difference between Lexus and Toyota is measurable. If anything I see way more old Toyotas on the road than I do old Lexuses. But that may be just because less were produced.

          • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Lexus is made by Toyota, just an fyi. To your point, a lot more vehicles are built with the Toyota badge than the Lexus badge. Options and creature comforts separate the two. Most (maybe all) of them share the same platform with each other.

            • cobra89@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Lexus is made by Toyota

              I’m well aware :) I don’t think that really changes anything of what I said though. Them being owned by the same parent company doesn’t really change anything other than the company culture of reliability, but even so Toyotas are more well known for their reliability. Luxury cars are also inherently less reliable just due to the fact they have more parts and also newer technologies for the luxury aspect that sometimes haven’t had all the kinks engineered out yet.