Over the years I’ve been trying to encapsulate, as simply as possible, what Beehaw interactions would look like ideally.

I kept coming back to all of my personal memories having holiday meals (Thanksgiving and Christmas for example) with very close family and friends.

Thinking back through decades of these meetings, I cannot remember anything but everyone being kind and charitable in action as well as speech.

Many pages of very thoughtful and reasonable philosophic explanations have been written, on our sidebar, about the behavioral expectations of Beehaw.

Let’s go back to the holiday meals for a moment and imagine having an open invitation for anyone to join. What do you think the outcomes would be?

This is the problem that our endeavor is experiencing. The open nature of ActivityPub (allowing anyone to join our table) is defeating our purpose.

The administrators, moderators and community members have been thinking about this for several months.

I, personally, believe that we all will come to a comfortable consensus moving forward.

  • interolivary@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t think the goal of Beehaw is momentum or growth, or at least that’s the way it’s seemed to me

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the worry is less about growth, and more about dying out. Too much external input can drown out the local conversation, but also too little external input can put too much pressure on the members to generate content, leading to burnout and also killing conversations.

      It’s a precarious balance between “so much that it gets out of control” and “so little that there is nothing left out”.

    • Reil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Without substantial growth after being cut off from the activity of the fediverse, Beehaw would not be large enough to stave off serious atrophy. The lemmy/kbin end of the fediverse is already very slow to begin with.

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Beehaw was around much before the current “population explosion” of the Fediverse, though, and by all accounts was doing just fine. Naturally it didn’t have as much content as it currently does, but the sort of reddit-esque content flood that some people seem to need really isn’t a requisite for sites to thrive.

        I’m on a small lemmy/reddit -like content aggregator / forum that has maybe a few hundred users, and while it’s certainly quiet compared to Lemmy nowadays, it’s got a small active community and nobody feels like it would need more “volume” to be a nice place to be.

        • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yea for sure …

          I’ve said it a few times in similar conversations before … the big-corp mega social media era (~2008-2023, Twitter/Reddit/Facebook/Instagram) has had huge cultural effects on the internet that go way beyond whether you’re on one of the platforms or not and which will ripple into the future for a long while.

          We’d all do well to consider what parts of that culture we carry in our expectations and behaviours … and the whole doom-scrolling through an all-encompassing feed as a form of entertainment expectation is a big one. Social media always needs to be a big place … is another one.

          These aren’t all necessarily evil … but as universal expectations they certainly aren’t good either, IMO.