• maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    While grandstanding might be a bit odd, it seems to me the broader point is about tech culture in general and what else it could be.

    The point about the dark third place resonated with me for instance, where fruitful and fulfilling third places can be quite hard to build and find IMO.

    • ericjmorey@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think the author’s idea of painting it as a dark third place is way off base (pretty much every point seems off base). Is reading a book a dark third place because you didn’t write the book?

      Third places are where you might have a conversation about the fun puzzle you solved, they aren’t the puzzle.

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well they state elsewhere in the post, rightly or wrongly, that they don’t think these are fun puzzles but instead promote a problematic junior dev ego thing. Beyond that the main thrust of their reasoning seems to be the whole developer “culture” of “needing” to do work outside of work. If you come to oppose this and don’t find the problems/solutions edifying, then “fun puzzle” is no longer an apt description and I think it makes a lot of sense to see the whole thing as relatively “dark” compared to what a nice or fulfilling “third place” can be.

        • ericjmorey@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s not even a third place.

          The idea that these puzzles which people are obviously enjoying are contributing to a poor culture among developers is not supported by his arguments. The author should simply make their case about the poor culture instead of shoe horning in a poor example of it backed with contrived reasons.

          If you don’t like the puzzles, ignore them. Same as any leisure activity, don’t force it. There’s nothing wrong with not participating. The author’s idea that there is something wrong with not participating is his problem.

          • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Well, if you don’t like their reasoning or rejection of AoC … you can ignore it too. I think you’re taking this a bit too seriously, it was never intended as a grand thesis on dev culture. It is a statement of a relatively specific sentiment that some agree or resonate with and some don’t. You’re looking for logic when there’s just opinion.

            • dylan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah but there’s a difference between saying, I don’t like JavaScript and here’s why” and “if you’re a JavaScript dev you are the worst kind of person”.