Government when the elites use loopholes and do devious shit:

I sleep

Government when the peasants use loopholes:

Straight to jail

Different kinds of alcohol is just different flavours of hand sanitiser.

Also torrents can be much faster & secure than direct downloads/mirrors.

To answer this, no they are not perfectly rational. However they are not dumb, anyone can be a rapist, it is a mental disorder which doesn’t correlate with their IQ.

The ‘tons of reasons’ statement would be interesting to read about, as usually a perpetrators focus is rape and escape. Not befriending the victim - i might suggest how inconsistent this sounds.

Unless the victim has other mental problems then this could occur. However, I was simply seeking an answer, not an explosive statement.

The question was why he didn’t do it sooner. Not when confronted.

If he knew he did something wrong, illegal, and immoral then why did he stay and wait until the victim wakes up.

Thanks for replying. I do see that there is some incompatibility with both our proof. However, I do realise that you’re talking about perpetrators which are close to the victim - and that may yield a different response to that of a random person/ newly met person.

Suffice to say, it does make sense that persons closest to the victim would be the perpetrator.

[Article answers second paragraph]

Thought that an exclaimer will work for some ignorant people but that’s how stuff works.

And I am also interested of why are you so deliberated of calling this ‘stupid shit’, and ‘awful take’? I know I have put it in words wrong and next time I’ll do it better, but I assure you fail to read and understand my comment first.

I’ll refrain from deleting this as I know there are people who understand what I wrote.

Oh sorry forgot the question mark there. My bad.

Hi, to answer your question I’d like to ask what convoluted reason did I state?

It’s nice to see you replied to my comment, and the last part of my comment was just a question which I am confused about.

And sorry for coming across as not believing. You could consider that serious accusations shouldn’t be based on beliefs - but facts.

Thanks for highlighting the parts of the article. Certainly answers some questions I had. The thing that can be said is that there isn’t clinical proof of the sexsomnia. So there is a low chance of her having it.

The man may have raped her. however, why didn’t he run away sooner? Usually perpetrators escape after the abuse (asking a question).

[Article answers second paragraph]

Interesting. The situation really puts into perspective how both genders have it difficult. It can really rule out anything, if the man really raped her, the woman caused a fake accusation or it was just a big misunderstanding.

Firstly, the woman who was suspected to have sexsomnia, did she really have sexsomnia? And what evidence did the research facility produce?

Secondly, the man who is blamed to have raped her, if consent was given while she was deemed as fully awake, then why is this situation occurring? Did he fail to realise she is not fully awake?

COPPA is a joke sometimes, they don’t really protect and like other American orgs it probably is lobbied.

The best case would be to protect everyone’s privacy, not just the children OR teens. And if they wanted to help then they would’ve outlined other orgs like Facebook - but that’s an American org.

Seems similar to the focus modes in iPhones like ‘work’ mode. However I don’t like the point about spying.

Not suprising. With all those trends and temporary fads, all those clothes have to go somewhere.

I agree, this situation is twisted on both sides. Additionally this situation seems like non-statutory rape which makes the 1 year sentence quite lenient.

Unfortunately still doesn’t explain what to do when you’re covered in piss 😔

It is in human nature that most people prefer not to be demonised by their abhorrent character/morals. One way to ‘break free’ or cover them up, is to demonise another minority. Of course, there is a lot of examples from extreme to light.

In context with your post, that minority does seem to be the most ostracised within the majority (even the non-offending) - to the situation that harassment and ‘murder?’ By most communities is tolerated.

The situation can be observed everywhere, online and offline; and one point can be ruled out in some cases “murder is justified if the person was a pedophile (non-offending & offending)”.

This is one of the most extreme cases of improving your character at the cost of others. Harassment will remain harassment no matter what.

Trends like this is like trickle down economics. If the adults find fun in using it the teens will use it, and then the children will catch on. I would argue it being illegal also encourages minors to get it; so even If they enforced it better, there would be people willing to take risks.

A what now? Are they trying to setup a circus.

I’m pretty sure it’s because the bad points far outweighs the good points, therefore canceling them.