• 8 Posts
  • 1.01K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle









  • Currently, credibility is verified in centralized manner for good reasons. One of them is to keep the shams out of the game. Sadly, such system has been abused rampantly.

    Such issue wouldn’t be as prevalent on Lemmy due to the casual nature of things, but if the stakes are to be raised, then it would really become a problem. Just look at how people have tried to abuse the very system we’re using.

    The voting manipulation comes to mind, with rogue instances being created just for the purpose of mobilizing an army of bot in the form of users. Since the very people doing the exploits were the ones running the instances, and the bot users were created in these rogue instances, the good instances (such as the one you’re using and the one I’m using) had no control. The could create millions of users if they want to and if the resource allows it, and there’s nothing any of us can do about it. They could the use these bot users to either raise a post to the front of your feed, or downvote it to oblivion. The one thing that can be done is to defederate from these rogue instances one way or another.

    This is just one example. I’m sure there are many more vulnerabilities out there. Maybe in time, the fediverse would become more and more mature against such thread model. Switching to instance whitelisting for federation policy has proved to be effective against the one I just mentioned.

    One thing that we can probably start with instead is to have independent journals, and maybe they can support one and another. The question would then be: how would they earn the credibility that our community can trust?